My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/10/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/10/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:29:09 AM
Creation date
5/25/2022 10:39:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
05/10/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Howell suggested changing the language so it doesn't say "identify a candidate" <br /> or"the candidates." <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff stated in one for Partial Year Terms where it says "Refer back to the <br /> recruitment file to identify the candidates for consideration for the current vacancy." The direction <br /> would be if there is a file of three or four applicants, those would be sent to the Judge. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher asked if there would be no recommendation from <br /> Council. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff replied correct. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Riley added, in response to the question if they get ranked, the answer is no. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if there is only one spot and three applications are sent, what <br /> happens to the two that don't get chosen. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Riley replied they stay in the file. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff asked if their clock starts over because they have already been in the <br /> file. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher replied that is a good question and asked for Council <br /> input. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if they would be looking for any feedback from the Judge as to <br /> why they selected that candidate and if there are any that would he wouldn't want reconsidered. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Riley replied what if he said no. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if then the clock would be restarted for consideration. <br /> Mayor Kuzma recommended restarting the 14 month clock for those applicants. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff replied the clock should go off the initial application to make it easier <br /> for the Staff to track. He suggested it could be extended to 16 months but felt everyone could also <br /> reapply. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove commented for tracking for the Staff to keep it at 14 months and not <br /> start if over. <br /> Mayor Kuzma replied he was fine with that. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher replied applications that are in the file, regardless of the <br /> process they have gone through, after 14 months from the date received they are no longer to be <br /> kept in the file. <br /> City Council Work Session/May 10, 2022 <br /> Page 19 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.