My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/10/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/10/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:29:09 AM
Creation date
5/25/2022 10:39:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
05/10/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Heineman commented he thought they were all ready to hear it so he would be <br /> okay with that. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove commented part of it has to do with the hiring process for the new City <br /> Administrator so she would want to be sensitive to that and so is looking for City Attorney <br /> direction on whether candidate Interim City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen <br /> should be present. <br /> Interim City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen offered to step out. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied he didn't know if there was a reason one way or another, it's up to <br /> him. <br /> Interim City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen stepped out. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove stated she sent the email and has paper copies. She asked if <br /> Administrative Services Lasher Director wanted one. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher replied yes please. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove stated she was sorry if she didn't send one to Administrative Services <br /> Director Lasher. She asked if everyone was able to open the email. She wanted to bring this up <br /> because it is the first Work Session since the last meeting. She stated the Interim City <br /> Administrator is a candidate involved with this discussion so she couldn't bring it to him. The HR <br /> Manager is part of the subject of the discussion so she didn't feel comfortable bringing to her but <br /> she felt like it needed to be part of the public record. As a Council, she needed to know who she <br /> should be speaking to. As a Council, she wanted to be able to come to that decision about, if they <br /> have questions and concerns about the hiring process who do they go to. She stated that is part of <br /> her reason. She stated she basically has it presented out with the information which one candidate <br /> received which was different than another candidate, which lead one candidate to send an email <br /> saying "I'm not going to. And I'm basically thanking you." And then the prior City Administrator <br /> did the right thing in a corrective action and sent out an email and so she has questions about the <br /> City Administrator did the right thing,was there Staff discussion that warranted this response. Did <br /> the Staff and the City Attorney have a discussion on how to resolve this and are there any potential <br /> legal issues with what happened. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Riley interrupted to state he is still reading the email. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove apologized. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Riley stated he needed to do her a service, he couldn't listen to her and read this. <br /> He didn't mean to interrupt. <br /> The Council took time to read the email. <br /> City Council Work Session/May 10, 2022 <br /> Page 26 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.