My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/10/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/10/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:29:09 AM
Creation date
5/25/2022 10:39:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
05/10/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Attorney Knaak replied personnel issues, anything that could involve litigation, even sensitive <br /> matters that would ordinarily require a lawyer to give confidential advice or hear confidential <br /> information from a client. He stated it was one of the least clearly defined exceptions. He stated <br /> it wasn't something that should be used unless there is some kind of serious issue related to <br /> personnel, pending litigation, or real estate purchases. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Riley asked if it needs to be noticed. <br /> City Attorney Knaak confirmed this, adding unless it is an emergency, in which case it has be to <br /> published as an emergency and he wasn't sure if this would necessarily qualify. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if just the Council meets with the attorney to get advice, is that <br /> considered a Closed Session meeting. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied no. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if they would do that after the City Council meeting. <br /> City Attorney Knaak confirmed this. He stated the danger of that is if it is thought that this could <br /> involve some sort of dispute, if it is on the record, they may end up waiving the attorney/client <br /> privilege so it is nice to know what will be discussed. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove replied she and City Attorney Knaak had a conversation on the <br /> weekend about it. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied he didn't know that it would be something that would require <br /> attorney/client privilege or could be closed. <br /> Councilmember Howell asked if the employee has the right to open the meeting. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied, yes if about the employee. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove replied that is fine. She stated she would rather have it in that <br /> respective way. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff suggested a special meeting on May 17, 2022 after the Public Works <br /> meeting, a week from today. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove stated some portion of her questions are timely and that is why she is <br /> looking for direction from Council to other Councilmembers on who to contact with City Staff <br /> regarding upcoming discussions. <br /> Mayor Kuzma agreed with doing it after the Public Works meeting. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied he wouldn't be available that night. <br /> City Council Work Session/May 10, 2022 <br /> Page 3 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.