My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/11/2022 - Joint WS
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/11/2022 - Joint WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:29:28 AM
Creation date
5/25/2022 10:41:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Title
Joint WS
Document Date
05/11/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Acting Mayor Riley suggested that they move to the parking structures that were planned at City <br /> cost. He stated that if there were something that would make the concept work, he would entertain <br /> that. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove commented that some of the maps she has seen show four parking <br /> structures and was unsure how that has been reduced and what the current number is within the <br /> framework. <br /> Interim City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen provided additional details on the <br /> most current adopted design within the framework, identifying the structured parking within the <br /> plan. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that the parking ramps would be dictated <br /> by the density of development that occurs. He stated that there may be a developer driven project <br /> that would require a parking ramp at some point. He noted that perhaps the City could provide <br /> TIF financing to assist with the parking structure. He did believe four parking structures would be <br /> too much and that the demand would be market driven. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if those areas should be rezoned for retail, housing, or business. <br /> Planning Commission Chair Bauer commented that the intention of The COR is to be pedestrian <br /> driven and there is not a lot of parking available. He stated that there is a need for at least one <br /> parking ramp,perhaps with more height,to provide the parking and encourage a pedestrian nature. <br /> Planning Commissioner Anderson stated that he agrees with that. He stated that there are vehicles <br /> parked in the existing ramp that are being stored by apartment residents. He stated that as they <br /> develop the Main Street concept, they may need another ramp. <br /> Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood noted that presently on street parking <br /> is not allowed overnight during the fall and winter but that could be an option in the future. He <br /> noted that there was an intention to have additional parking for the park use which would primarily <br /> be used in the evenings and weekends and therefore could be shared by others during the days. He <br /> stated that there could also be surface parking that could eventually be covered parking. He <br /> commented that large parking lots generate very little taxable income. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove commented that the Council discussed the parking ramp including <br /> appropriate and inappropriate uses, with direction to City staff for enforcement to ensure <br /> appropriate use of those spaces. <br /> Acting Mayor Riley confirmed the consensus to remove two parking structures with a suggest <br /> versus require method. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff agreed with the market driven approach to having a parking structure. <br /> He commented that south of Highway 10 could be another good location for a transit ramp, noting <br /> City Council Joint Work Session/May 11, 2022 <br /> Page 11 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.