My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/11/2022 - Joint WS
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/11/2022 - Joint WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:29:28 AM
Creation date
5/25/2022 10:41:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Title
Joint WS
Document Date
05/11/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Woestehoff stated that he agrees with the right-in/right-out concept but questioned <br /> if the City should do anything without a developer involved as their desired layout may change <br /> from what is proposed by Java. He stated that he also has concern with the potential for a vehicle <br /> to take a U-turn at the railroad tracks. <br /> Interim City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen replied that the developer would <br /> want as much space as possible, therefore they would attempt to come as close to Veterans Drive <br /> as possible. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff stated that he would be in favor of not expanding Peridot as there are <br /> plenty of roads and access. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that Peridot was brought up through the <br /> review of O'Reilly's from police and fire. He agreed that they do not know what Peridot will be, <br /> but something will be needed to relieve the development in that area. <br /> Planning Commission Chair Bauer commented that he would prefer to be proactive in order to <br /> assist potential developers. <br /> Acting Mayor Riley commented that his concern would be if this does not occur during the <br /> construction, the County may not approve it in the future. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan agreed that would be important in order to take <br /> advantage of the opportunity. <br /> Acting Mayor Riley confirmed the consensus of the group to support that action. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if TIF dollars could be used for that purpose. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan stated that would be a TIF eligible cost,but they would <br /> need to check with finance to determine if funds are available. <br /> Interim City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen moved to the topic of building <br /> aesthetics and confirmed that the vision remains true. He moved to residential versus retail, noting <br /> that uses do support each other. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that a developer recently completed a <br /> market study and found there was not enough desired housing within the three-mile trade area. He <br /> stated that more residents are needed in order to support some of the business proformas. <br /> Planning Commission Chair Bauer suggested that perhaps the City look at the temporary freeze <br /> for apartment buildings within The COR, noting a low vacancy rate within the existing buildings <br /> in The COR. He stated that perhaps they also look at smaller lot sizes within the ring outside The <br /> COR in order to increase that density. <br /> City Council Joint Work Session/May 11, 2022 <br /> Page 8 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.