My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 10/25/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2005
>
Minutes - Council - 10/25/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 1:56:40 PM
Creation date
10/17/2005 9:04:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/25/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Administrator Norman stated this study was a discussion item at the Council's goal setting <br />session. The study referred to by the Mayor was a fiscal impact study and was only for <br />budgetary purposes. This study would be much more in depth and would calculate what the <br />model o1' the organization should look like. Staff recommends strongly that the Council go <br />Forward with this study, which is within the budget projected. A portion of the study could likely <br />bc lhndcd fi'om next year's budget. <br /> <br />Cotmci Imember Cook stated this study is needed to determine if the organization is functioning <br />properly now and how personnel can function more properly. He had sticker shock at the price, <br />b~ ~t it wats explained that the department heads are willing to pay a portion of their budget for the <br />study. [lc noted it is one thing to conduct a self evaluation, but it is another to have someone <br />else look att changes that could be made. <br /> <br />Counci lmcmbcr Strommen stated this study is an entirely different process than a self evaluation, <br />and would be beneficial. She questioned how this study would intersect in terms of determining <br />tl-~e service delivery model based on demographic projections versus a policy decision of what <br />the City would like to provide to the residents. She asked if the study would include working <br />with thc Council and the department heads so the policy piece fits in with those external factors. <br /> <br />tl uman Resources Manager Reed indicated Council interaction wilt be an important piece of this <br />study. She agrees that it is important to have the eyes from the outside looking in. <br /> <br />C o u nc il m em ber Elvig stated he went through this process with his business and the benefit was <br />tremendous. There needs to be staff and Council objectives laid out first with a target for the <br />organization conducting the study. They all need to look at that target and determine the <br />deliverables on that target. To run an organization of this size is a monumental task, and it is <br />amazing what can be learned from this type of study. This cost of $45,000 for the study is a <br />sleal, and it is a wonderful time to take this on. <br /> <br />Cotmcilmember Pearson stated he was surprised at the cost of the study, but Assistant City <br />Administrator Nelson steered him to the answers he was looking for. He would be in favor of <br />moving ahead with a study like this. <br /> <br />Cotmcilmcmber Elvig inquired how far this dollar amount for the study will take them. <br /> <br />Ms. Reed replied this study should take them through the recommendation phase. Springsted <br />wilt provide the recommendation, but the implementation will be up to the City. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Cook, to ratify the <br />recommendation of the Personnel Committee for Case No. 1 and to adopt Resolution #05-10-364 <br />granting authorization to enter into a contract with Springsted, Inc. to conduct an organizational <br />sludy for the City of Ramsey at a cost not to exceed $45,000. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Elvig requested clarification that $45,000 is the cap for the <br />cost of the study. Ituman Resources Manager Reed replied the cost will not exceed $45,000. <br /> <br />City Council / October 25, 2005 <br /> Page 20 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.