Laserfiche WebLink
10. <br /> <br />That on October 6, 2005, the Ramsey Planning Commission, on a 5-1 vote recommended to <br />the City Council that the proposed rezoning be approved and findings .of fact favorable to <br />the rezoning be approved. <br /> <br />That the proposed development will/will not exercise substantial detrimental influence on <br />thc market value of surrounding properties. <br /> <br />12. That the proposed development will/wiI1 not show a favorable economic impact on the <br /> community at large. <br /> <br />That the proposed development will/will not adversely impact natural features such as <br />wetlands, water features, woodlands, and steep slopes. <br /> <br />I4. That the proposed development will/will not protect and preserve scenic qualities to the <br /> greatest extent possible. <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />That the proposed development will/will not impose undue burden on public services and <br />fhcilities, including fire and police protection, schools, streets, water systems, san2ary <br />sexver systems and storm sewer systems. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />That the proposed development is/is not designed in such a way as to form a desirable and <br />unified environment within its own boundaries, and also will be detrimental to future land <br />uses in the surrounding areas. <br /> <br />NOWTHEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS THE <br />FO LLOWING DEVIATIONS FROM CITY CODE ACCEPTABLE: <br /> <br /> ri'hat the following deviations from City Ordinances are found acceptable as part of this <br /> PUD; <br /> · Smaller lot sizes for urban single-family lots. <br /> · Narrower lot widths for urban single-family lots. <br /> · Ability to construct small lot single-family lots in area guided as Medium Density' <br /> Residential <br /> · Narrower public road right-of-way than required. <br /> · Four 12-unit town.home buildings (Lots 5-8, Block 7) in area previously zoned R-2 <br /> Medium Density Residential <br /> · Reduced corner side-yard setbacks for 2 lots (Lot 1, Block 3;and Lot 5, Block 6). <br /> <br />motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the fbllowing voted against the same: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #05-xx-xxx <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />-193- <br /> <br /> <br />