Laserfiche WebLink
detnand arriving on ir. Such a situation would resuk in ions queues and extensive delays, <br />or di'~'ei~ion to alternate routes. <br /> <br />Aaab'sis and Mitiaadon Measures <br /> <br />Each intersection was analyzed by the criteria listed above. The signaI timings have been <br />optimized for the s ign'~ized intersections since this would provide the best operations for <br />eacl~ scenm'io, including the Exi, rting. The 2005 mad 2007 anaJysis year scenarios utilize <br />the current roadway layout. This ctu'rcnt layout has fi.ye keF' intersections ot's.tudy. The <br />results of the operational analysis 'for 2005 and 2007 are shown in Tables 5 and 6. The <br />Build condition is hhe baseline volumes with only the P~dte development traffic. The Full <br />Build condition is the baseline volumes with ~h¢ Pulte Developmem, Town Center 1, ~md <br />the Superstore. <br /> <br />Tqble 5' 2005 Oper'~tJonqt Am~lysis * - <br />Intersection and TrnffiC Contri~l Scenario Penk Hour intersection !Maxi~num Delay- <br /> Detay*-LOS LOS-v/ca* <br /> <br />Ex/sting <br /> <br />Armstrong Bird & TH 10/169 <br />I ,S'ig,~ah'zed , <br />Armstrong Blvd & Indusa.'y Ave NW I Exist!ng <br /> <br />iArmsrrong glvd & ,'&1pine Drive NW <br /> <br />Existing <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />AlVl. <br />?M <br /> <br />A M <br />DM <br /> <br />26.8-C <br />20,O-C <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />NiA <br /> <br />89.1-F-0.95 <br />62.7-E:0.82 <br /> <br />lO.9-g-O. 18 <br />t i,7-B-0.12 <br /> <br />13.0~B-0.14 <br />{ LO-C-O, l 8 <br /> <br />pine DriwNW& TH i0/169 i Existing Aivl N/A 19,9-C-0.59 <br /> O'.sOc./izod { ' PM 51,4-F-0.57 <br /> N/A <br /> <br />Alpine Drive NW & Nutria Street NWI Existing AM <br /> <br />, U~a'iwtalia? I '{. PM <br /> *Delay in seconds per vehicle **Maximum delay, LOS. and <br /> <br />-9..D-A-0.03 <br />9. <br /> <br />v/c tmtlo on any approach and/or movement <br /> <br />Based on the analysis of existing conditions, the intersection of Alpine Drive NW and TH <br />10 operates at with an unacceptable level of delay and tevei of*service on the Alpine <br />Drive approach~ Signaiizafionwould bring all the movements at the intersection to LOS <br />D or above, however with the low volume o.n Alpine Drive, fl~e intersection would likely <br />not meet signa. J warrants. <br /> <br />The intersection of'TI-I [0 and Armstrong Boulevard also experiences poor level of <br />service on specific movements. The current configuration of traffic lanes southbotmd <br />does not provide enough lanes for the high volume'of turning vehicles. Am additional <br />southbound ich ttwn lane in addition [o the current thru/left lmxe ,,vou[d provide eno'ugh <br />capacity for the traffic and bring the LOS for fine movement to D or above. Ali other <br />intersections analyzed perfbrm we{l under tv,'o-way' stop control. <br /> <br />-236- <br /> <br />?ulze Home.s' Develo]2menl EA ;l:" <br />D'u. ffic Impact S/z/dy <br />Ci~' of Rams<y, ,4no&; C2ounO,, Minnesota <br /> <br />Bo/ton & ,44enid, &c <br /> <br /> <br />