Laserfiche WebLink
to raise the level of'service to D or above tbr all the movements, the intersection should <br />be siNmtized and north and south left tu.m Lanes shouid be added. <br /> <br />The two other intersections along Armstrong peribrm yew poorty under the B~dld and' <br />?'ult. BuikY scenarios, The intersections with industry and TH 10 require a large voKu'ne <br />of traffic to travel through th~m and wilt require major reconstruction, Armstrong at <br />lndusnD, will requh'e st~malization and the addition of through [ames and mrn lanes. <br />A~mstrong at TH !0 would either require a six-tune divided highway for TH 10 with a <br />triple left southbound from .armstrong to eastbound 'I'I-I 10 or the eonaruction of a full <br />J. nterehange with access ramps ~:o TH 10. <br /> <br />The traffic control and lanes d~at are required for the _00 / scenarios are included as <br />Figure 9. With the mi/gated measures as outlined above the resulting measures of <br />effectiveness are outlined in Tab}e 7. <br /> <br />Table 7:2007 Mitigated Operation:fl Ahab,sis <br />Intersection & Traffic Conn'ol Scenario Peak Hour <br /> <br />Armstrong Bird 8: TH 1(1/169 <br /> .Dgmdized <br /> <br />Armstrong Bird & b~dust~ Ave NW <br /> <br />Armstrong 81vd &Aipine Drive NW <br /> <br /> U~xigmdiz~d <br /> <br />[&/pine Drive NW & TH 10/[69 <br /> <br />Signal 'zed' <br /> <br />Alpine Drive NW & Nu,'ia Straet <br /> Unxignalized <br /> <br />In/t;rscction. <br />Oelay*-LOS <br /> <br /> LOS-v/c* <br />Buitd AM 23. t-C 46 <br /> PM 23.4-C 52.0-D-0.84 <br /> <br />Bui Ld <br /> <br />Full Build <br /> <br />Build <br /> <br />Full Build <br /> <br />Build <br /> <br />Full Build <br /> <br />^M <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />A/vi <br />PM <br /> <br />34.3-C <br />66. l-E <br /> <br />29.6-C <br />20.4-C <br /> <br />Maximum Delay- <br /> <br />54,4-D-0,92 <br />125,0~?-l.13 <br /> <br />Build <br /> <br />62,6-F.-0.92 <br />oT.0-D-0.§~ <br /> <br />7§.S-E-I.08 <br />96.$-F-I. IS <br /> <br />AM 5,9-A 9,8-A-0.34 <br />PM 6. I~A 9.5-A.0.34 <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />6.0-A <br />8. <br /> <br />7.4-A <br />9.2-A <br /> <br />7.8-A <br />'9.5-A <br /> <br />A/vi <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />P:M <br /> <br />Ful'l Build A/vi <br />. PM <br /> <br />I 1.7-B-0.44 <br /> <br />t 6,6-B-0.6 I <br />22,0-C-0.66 <br /> <br />25.1rC43.74 <br />4 1,0-L5-018 I' <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />9.6-A-0.05 <br />i0..1-8-0.05 <br /> <br />9.62;\-0,07 <br />'I 0. l-B:0105 <br /> <br />*Delay in seconds per vehicle **Maximum delay, LOS. and <br /> <br />v/c ratio on any approach and/.or movement <br /> <br />With the addition of the Superstore and Town Center 1, the j. ntersection ofl'ndustry and <br />Armstrong fails under signalization in 2007, even with the mitigation measures as <br />designated on Figure 9. Without the Superstore and only Town Cenl:er 1 added to the <br />Pulte Development U'af'fic, the intersection does not fail. <br /> <br />-238- <br /> <br />?u//e Homes Development <br /> <br />Ci0, qf Ram,~'ey <br /> <br />page lc? of 24 <br />Prepc~red by: <br /> <br /> <br />