Laserfiche WebLink
fn addition, the City received a federal grant ~bf $2.5 million to look at the Thurston on/off ramp <br />~ na $I million for a bridge across the Mississippi River. Highway #10 has been mapped and <br />properties purchased to make it a feasible corridor. Councilmember Elvig stated the Councit has <br />be~n extremely aggressive and successful in looking at highway corridors. <br /> <br />Mr. Bud Augst, 15700 Traprock Street, asked Councilmember Cook to define the ordinance on <br />transition buffer zones between one area and a new developing area. <br /> <br />/\ttorney Goodrich stated the Council is under no obligation to answer a question like this and <br />the Council is to receive resident comments at this time. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec explained it is up to the City Council to consider several differ4nt options. He <br />stated it is not known at this time which will be considered with Traprock. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Jeffrey, to adopt Resolution #05- <br />03-085 Approving the Request and Authorizing Staff to Submit the Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment to the Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Strommen stated that her comments on the last case apply to <br />this case as well. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Elvig, Jeffrey, Cook, and <br />Pearson. Voting No' Councilmember Strommen. Absent: Councilmember Olson. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Request for Sketch Plan Review of Brookfield Addition; Case of Oakwood <br />Land Development -~ <br /> <br />I~: was noted the staff report for Case #6 was presented with Case #5. <br /> <br />(;ouncihnember Elvig stated the satUration was 50 units per year and Mr. PeterSon indicated that <br />was a ?od year of sales so this would take six to seven years to fill out. He asked if the build <br />out could occur towards the north so the abutting areas are developed last instead of first. <br /> <br />bar. Peterson stated he is being asked to hold certain lots for future phases. However, certain <br />r~eighbors are interested in also developing so they would be opposed to that option. <br /> <br />Case ¢7: Request for Sketch Plan Review of Pulte Homes <br /> <br />(;octnci. lmember Elvig stated he has a conflict of interest with this case but has a lot of experience <br />with Town Center and would not suggest to comment related to densities. HoWever, he would <br />like to comment related to traffic flows. He stated he will abstain from the vote. <br /> <br />r._:ommunity Development Director Trudgeon advised that the City is in receipt of a concept plan <br /> 'd~c development of 190 acres located north of Highway #t0, west of Armstrong Boulevard, <br /> south of Alpine Drive. This is sketch plan consideration. He noted the subject propert7 is <br /> <br />City Council / March 22, 2005 <br /> Page 28 of 38 <br /> <br />-267- <br /> <br /> <br />