My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/25/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 10/25/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:57:42 PM
Creation date
10/24/2005 11:45:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/25/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Gamec stated in the past road imProvements have been addressed based on petitions. He <br />suggested the homeowners must sign a petition for the Council to bring this discussion to a work <br />session. <br /> <br />(~ouncilmember Jeffrey directed staff to determine if the homeowners have come to an <br />agreement and that the situation has been diffused, as there needs to be some sort of closure to <br />this situation. <br /> <br />Council~nember Cook stated the homeowners should understand that the only action the City can <br />take to resolve the situation is to improve the road to a full width road. If the homeowners want <br />something other than that they will need to come to an agreement amongst themselves. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich advised at the current time 160th Lane is a public road that the City will <br />maintain and snowplow. <br /> <br />Com~nittee/Staff Input <br /> <br />Receive Request from Colleen Fisher for a stop sign at 154th Lane at Marmoset <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig reported that the City has received a request from a resident for a stop sign <br />at ]54th Lane and Marmoset. Further information will be brought to the next Public Works <br />Committee meeting. <br /> <br />City Standards for 8 Foot versus I0 Foot Trails <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson reviewed the cost analysis regarding 8 foot trails versus <br />10 foot trails as a standard in the City that wa.s, provided to the Public Works Committee. He <br />advised the recommendation of staff and the Public Works Committee was to include a 10 foot <br />'crail paver in the budget, and to explore the cost and benefits of purchasing alarger trail paver. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Cook, to ratify the <br />recommendation of the Public Works Committee in Committee/Staff Input and to direct staff to <br />include a 10 foot trail paver in the budget, and to explore the cost and benefits of purchasing a <br />larger trail paver. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor' Gamec, Councilmembers Elvig, Cook, Jeffrey, Olson, <br />Pearson, and Strommen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Elvig directed staff ~o provide the Council with the cost of. <br />ti~e ~.rail pavers that was included in the Public Works Committee discussion. Assistant Public <br />Works Director Olson indicated the information will be included in the Weekly Update. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated he has been contacted by concerned residents regarding the impact a 10 <br />ibot trail width will make on their property in the area south o£ 160th and St. Francis Boulevard. <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied the street in this area will be 28 feet wide and will <br />include an 8'foot striped trail. <br /> <br />City Council / October 11, 2005 <br /> Page 15 of 17 <br /> <br />-35- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.