Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/23/2022

Home

Amanda Patrow, 16209 Sapphire Street, stated that one of the main concerns she has is related to the floodplain area. She stated that she has another concern with noise and asked if a sound study has been completed. Senior Planner Anderson replied that there will be a PA system. Ms. Patrow commented that the neighborhood can already hear noise from Central Park and additional trees would help to buffer that noise. She stated that if this is going to go into a residential neighborhood, there should be assurance that this will not impact those homes. She stated that the staff presentation mentioned that Variolite was eliminated for safety reasons but noted that she watched the PACT School Board meeting, and it was said that option was eliminated because of a lack of funding. Kristy Haight, 7600 163rd Lane NW, stated that there has been a large amount of rain in the last week which has filled the ditches. She stated that they have concern that removing the trees and developing the site could cause additional issues with water if the water is not managed appropriately on the site. Mr. Patrow stated that the oak forest that will be removed to make space for the retention pond will also remove the shade provided by the forest to the wetland. He stated that could change the character of the wetland. He asked for additional details on a prevention system that would ensure that the pond does not overflow into the wetland. Jeff Lubarski, 7826 161 st Avenue, stated that he is concerned that all the traffic will now be placed on 161 St which means the road needs to be widened and trees on adjacent properties will be damaged. He stated that if the road is widened it will also lend itself to commercial vehicles coming down the residential road. He was concerned with the safety of the children in the neighborhood because of the increased traffic. Board Member Hiatt referenced the photos provided by residents related to rainfall levels and asked how often this situation is occurring. Mr. Lindenberg replied that those photos are of his property and that typically happens a few times per season, maybe three times. He noted that the current system is not designed to handle much more water and confirmed that he has voiced concerns to the City in the past. Mr. Fincher commented that funding was one aspect for eliminating Variolite, but it was not the only aspect of that decision. He stated that the way he understood it there are no specific light or noise ordinances that apply to this type of project. He stated that they have addressed the lighting concern with submission of their lighting plan. He stated that in terms of noise,they would be less programmed than Central Park in terms of how their football field would be used for events. Board Member Hiatt asked the projected seating capacity for the football field. Mr. Fincher estimated seating for 600, which would have 300 spaces per side. He noted that calculation is not exact but that would be the maximum.