Laserfiche WebLink
i` <br /> • • referenced a previous discussion Commissioner Anderson had with the { <br /> Senior Planner Anderson�efe <br /> applicant related to the number of trips and noted that the applicant estimated deliveries and noted <br /> p <br /> that employees should also be counted. <br /> Mr. Hillman commented that he only has one employee and estimated seven including deliveries <br /> . �' <br /> and the employee. <br /> Commissioner walker commented that the applicant is also including Amazon and other delivery <br /> pp �. <br /> vehicles in that number and did not believe those would be counted if they were going to a home !. <br /> as Amazon could be delivering a product ordered by the home. <br /> Commissioner Anderson commented that he would not count Amazon and those delivery vehicles . <br /> as every home has those. y <br /> Commissioner walker commented t• that in terms of a traffic count it would seem to be two.trucks <br /> (semi or dock) and three for the employee. <br /> } <br /> Commissioner Anderson clarified that all those things need to be written down in the case the <br /> Commission supports the request. <br /> pp <br /> Commissioner Walker agreed but wanted to ensure Amazon and those types of deliveries are not <br /> counted. <br /> Chairperson Bauer referenced a property that is blacked out on the map and asked if that is wetland. <br /> City Planner McCann replied that is the PUD zoning district. <br /> Chairperson Bauer asked the specifics on the PUD. <br /> City Planner McCann was unsure. He noted that it appears to be residential. <br /> Senior Planner Anderson replied that is a PUD, but he is confident it was residential deviation <br /> from Code. He stated that about a decade ago there was a HOP request from the property at 6160 <br /> that was denied. <br /> Commissioner walker suggested a motion noting that he would be open to suggestion on <br /> additional conditions. <br /> Commissioner Anderson suggested that the applicant work with staff to define the number of trips, <br /> hours of operation, and that there be inspection by the Fire Chief to determine if modifications <br /> would be necessary to support manufacturing. <br /> Commissioner walker stated that he would agree with the first two conditions but would be <br /> opposed to the condition requiring inspection by the Fire Chief. He stated that if the manufacturing <br /> is moved over the applicant could come back and make that request and that could be brought in <br /> at that time. <br /> i <br /> Planning Commission/April 28,2022 <br /> Page 10 of 20 <br />