Laserfiche WebLink
I- <br /> 1`. <br /> i` <br /> 3 <br /> 7.04: Public Hearing: Consider Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Exceed Accessory <br /> Building Square Footage Allotment at 18055 Saint Francis Boulevard NW (Project <br /> No. 22--114); Case of Trevor and Ashley Nordick <br /> Public Hearin <br /> I <br /> s <br /> Chairperson Bauer called the public hearing to order at 9:05 p.m. <br /> Presentation <br /> Senior Planner Anderson presented the staff report stating staff recommends approval of the <br /> Conditional Use Permit,with the contingency that the membrane-type structure is removed and/or <br /> converted to a more "permanent" type of structure and one of the smaller accessory buildings is <br /> removed altogether from the subject property. The proposed use(indoor horse-riding arena)seems <br /> reasonable based on the zoning and guidance of the subject property. The applicant has stated that '. <br /> it would be-compatible in color with the dwelling and based on existing conditions, it would be <br /> g g <br /> somewhat screened from public view (especially considering the speed limit on Saint Francis <br /> Boulevard). The total number of detached accessory buildings could be addressed via the <br /> Conditional Use Permit. He noted that one written comment was received. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy asked why a CUP is being used rather than a variance. <br /> Senior Planner Anderson replied that an oversized accessory building is allowed through CUP in <br /> the R-1 district. <br /> Citizen Input <br /> _ s <br /> Trevor and Ashley Nordick, applicants, were present to address any questions. <br /> Chairperson Bauer referenced the current structures and membrane structure. He asked What is <br /> stored to the membrane structure. . <br /> Mr. Nordick replied that firewood is stored in that structure. He commented that he has 11 cord <br /> of firewood and did not believe that would be desired in the riding arena. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy referenced the accessory buildings onsite and asked if one is planned to <br /> be removed. <br /> Mr. Nordick stated that one of the deals they made with the seller of the property was to allow <br /> them to store things in that accessory building for a set period of time. He stated that the sellers <br /> are,working to remove those items and then that structure Will be removed. <br /> Commissioner Gengler asked the applicant for thoughts on possibly reducing accessory structures. <br /> Mr. Nordick stated that they could also remove the firewood shed and put a tarp over the wood. <br /> He stated that the home was originally built in 1912 With a barn that the tack is currently stored in. <br /> Planning Commission/April 28,2022 <br /> Page 16 of 20 <br />