My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/28/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 06/28/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:33:25 PM
Creation date
6/28/2022 10:48:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/28/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Cosovan replied the sprinkler was in the way but was pretty sure it could be moved or replaced. <br /> He stated the reason is because of the slope and a retaining wall would be needed to make it level. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if it is granted and the shed is in the easement and later Council <br /> asks that it be moved, would he then be willing to move it and do the grading. <br /> Mr. Cosovan replied he will move it if he needed to. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if Mr. Zhelayskyi were given time to do the grading and move <br /> the shed maybe by next year if he would consider that. <br /> Mr. Cosovan translated for Mr. Zhelayskyi to answer. The answer was that Mr. Zhelayskyi would <br /> like to keep it in the same place because a retaining wall would be needed. If he were asked by <br /> the City to move the shed he may destroy it instead of trying to save it. He stated there isn't a <br /> concrete slab but on a post. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove commented from the pictures the shed is already on uneven ground and <br /> has stabilizing anchors it is sitting on. <br /> Councilmember Riley asked if a permit was required to put this in. <br /> City Planner McCann replied that is correct, a permit was required and the applicant applied for <br /> it. As part of the Staff review it was determined that the easement encroachment was needed first. <br /> Councilmember Riley asked if it was correct that the permit was applied for now and not before <br /> the shed was put in. <br /> City Planner McCann replied correct. <br /> Councilmember Riley stated it was put in without City approval and the applicant is now asking <br /> if it is okay. <br /> City Planner McCann replied yes that is correct. <br /> Mayor Kuzma commented there are permits and ordinances for a reason. If this were to be <br /> approved it would make it difficult for other residents that are outside the perimeters of the <br /> easements. He stated he was not in favor of changing the denial request. <br /> Councilmember Heineman commented it is a big task and he was in favor of continuing to deny it <br /> with some of the language Councilmember Musgrove suggested by August 1, 2023. <br /> Councilmember Howell asked if there is a problem if the process is delayed to give the landowner <br /> time to figure out what works with his property. <br /> City Planner McCann replied he didn't have concerns with giving more time. <br /> City Council/June 14,2022 <br /> Page 7 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.