Agenda - Council - 07/12/2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

i% ;s Mr. Fincher stated that he is unsure of the logistics of extending the 60-day review period. He reiterated the timeline of PACT which was to begin construction later summer, or early fall. He stated that he fears that if this is pushed too far down the road it could become not feasible to begin construction this year. He stated that if there is a recommendation to work with the residents, they would do so and asked if that could be done in the time before the City Council meeting noting that they could also work with City staff during that time. F Community Development DirlDeputy City Admin Brian Hagen stated that the desired open date for PACT is fall of 2023 and recognized the sizeable construction. He stated that ultimately the City has a process to follow as well. He stated that if the Commission feels that it has seen enough information to make a recommendation to the Council that could be done. He noted that the Commission could also request to see more information on the plans and provide another opportunity for residents to provide input. He recognized that this could delay the project by a minimum of one month. He stated that the applicant could also request a special meeting of the Commission, although that could be tricky with including a public hearing. He asked if the public hearing could be closed and whether a second public hearing could be noticed for a special meeting. F:.. Senior Planner Anderson replied that could be done as long as the proper noticing timelines would p g p p g be met. He stated that if the meeting were tabled to the next Commission meeting, it would be June 23��, which would then follow to City Council on July 12t . } I Mr. Fincher commented that followingthe City Council meeting there would be another 3 0-da '- y g y period for the rezoning,which is tied to their entitlements. ;J Senior Planner Anderson confirmed that to be correct. He stated that the City Council approvals I for the zoning and Comprehensive Plan amendment were contingent upon approval of the f preliminary plat. He stated that once the preliminary plat is approved, the ordinance would be published and there would be a 30-day period before the ordinance goes into effect. t Randy Bauer, 14942 Quintana Street NW, commented that there have been preliminary plats with questions on numerous occasions that are addressed through conditions and contingencies. He stated that in those instances the preliminary plat is approved contingent upon the staff recommendations being met. j Councilmember woestehoff referenced the small parcel of parkland that would be deeded back to the City and asked if that would be a better opportunity for sto:rnwater management and what the alternative would be for park dedication. r Senior Planner Anderson commented that the Park Commission took action last in the last month to reiterate a previous decision and formalize their interest in having that northwest corner 1 dedicated as parkland for expansion of a flex field use there. He stated that the potential to use 1 that as additional retention pond area would involve park staff and the Park and Recreation Commission. He stated that a potential alternative would be to continue to encourage the church and school to work together to determine if there is additional opportunity to provide additional treatment on the church site. i Planning Commission/May 26,2022 Page 14 of 20