Agenda - Council - 07/12/2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

l: is I Josh Nyquist, 14852 Peridot Street NW, and Executive Director of Building operations at PACT asked that the Commission give them a chance to meet the requirements from the LRRwMO and related to traffic. He stated that they would meet the building requirements and recognized that MI]E does not review to that level, but more as to whetherthe site would work for a school and whether it could be done financially. He stated that they want to be good neighbors and address concerns of those that live nearby, which is why they are these public meetings to gain that input. He stated that they can review field scheduling and the types of systems in order to mitigate noise and light. He stated that the school wants to be a good presence. He noted that the students often clean up the park nearby the existing location and would hope they could do those things at the new location as well. He commented that they currently have a shared parking agreement with Northgate Church that works well. He stated that there is traffic two tunes per day and school is in session 154 days per year,therefore that is important when thinking about the impact of traffic. Commissioner Peters commented that he does not believe that everyone is 100 percent against the school. He stated that if all the things were addressed,the schoo ould be supported. He stated that a school going into a neighborhood adjacent to a park is a go it. He commented that he also likes that there will be a secondary school coming to R He believes that PACT should work with the residents and acknowledged that they are tryin that he has been blessed to have the experience of living in different states and que g dif erent schools for his kids. He stated that they will figure this out as a community. ell es that it makes sense to have a school in this location and if they all work together to figure it should work. He encouraged PACT to work with these residents as the conti ue to c e orward. He believed that this will y be worked out but there needs to be more c boration b een the community and PACT. l Community Development Dir/Dep it d Brian Hagen stated that if the Commission desires to continue this review, it o t close the public hearing but instead should continue it to the next meeting, g i Commissioner Anderso etails on the review timeline. Community Develop nt Dir/ puty City Admin Brian Hagen replied that they are still within the first 60-day revie •iod d would have the ability to extend that b another 60 days. He y y Y y stated that if the desire is ntinue it should be formal/ done through motion to a specific date. y g p �- Senior Planner Anderson commented that the Citywould need to issue a 60-day extension as the y - first 60-day period would expire before it reached the City Council. Acting Chairperson Gengler commented that there would then be an option to continue the public hearing which would then not require a table or any action on the applications. k, Senior Planner Anderson confirmed that to be true but asked that if that route is chosen, specific information is provided on what the Commission would desire before the next meeting. Community Development Dir/Deputy City Admin Brian Hagen stated that he would also want f input from the applicant on their timeline to respond as well. i PlanningCommission/May 26 2022 `Y y � Page 13 of 20 i=