My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/12/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 07/12/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:34:08 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 9:10:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/12/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
614
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Woestehoff asked how the case got on the agenda at the next meeting. <br /> Councilmember Howell replied that was not the same case. She stated she was very specific. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff replied he saw what she was saying and was misunderstanding. <br /> Councilmember Howell stated she brought forward fact finding, that was not her case, but a <br /> different one. She suggested they look at the information, some of it was surprising to her, and <br /> then make decisions based on the information. She suggested taking a step back and knowing they <br /> may not agree on things, but asked that things someone else brought forward not be assigned to <br /> her because it's not helpful and ends up in the paper. She stated it is frustrating and not helpful to <br /> the City. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff agreed. He stated most of his comments during the meeting were <br /> directed to Councilmember Musgrove. He stated Councilmember Howell happened to be sitting <br /> next to him and being combative, therefore he was talking to her. <br /> Councilmember Howell replied she didn't think she was being combative. <br /> City Attorney Knaak commented it sounds like there is something to be learned from all this in <br /> terms of what can be interpreted and what can't be interpreted. He thought it was worthwhile and <br /> they are still talking to each other, which is important. He hoped they could get past it. He asked <br /> Mayor Kuzma what else he should talk about. <br /> Mayor Kuzma replied he thought they had touched on things that were important and they could <br /> all better themselves by taking a look at some of the League information. <br /> City Attorney Knaak stated he will follow up with the email with some links. He encouraged <br /> Council to look at them because it is useful information from the League. He added, for those that <br /> might be interested,there is both an advanced and not advanced course where they get a chance to <br /> network with other City Councilmembers. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if City Attorney Knaak was also going to provide a list for <br /> procedures. <br /> Councilmember Specht added the PowerPoint. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied he will give the PowerPoint, do the presentation, or both. He stated <br /> he will send the PowerPoint and they can decide if they have heard enough on this topic or if they <br /> want more. <br /> 3. TOPICS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION <br /> 3.01: Review Future Topics/Calendar <br /> City Council Work Session/June 28, 2022 <br /> Page 16 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.