My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 06/21/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2022
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 06/21/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:51:01 PM
Creation date
7/22/2022 8:43:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
06/21/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Woestehoff stated that because this is rural residential with less density it would <br /> seem like a prime candidate for the light reclaim option. He asked if there would be a hybrid <br /> option. <br /> Chairperson Riley asked for details on the half cul-de-sac proposed. <br /> Civil Engineer II Feriancek replied that would allow turn around space for emergency vehicles. <br /> He did not believe residents would provide additional right-of-way for a full cul-de-sac as it would <br /> significantly impact the resident to the north and take most of his driveway. <br /> Chairperson Riley commented that this was planned for last year and is now planned for this year <br /> but is just being brought forward now which means it may not be completed. He asked why this <br /> did not come forward earlier. <br /> City Engineer Westby replied that this was the last project and staff has had a heavy workload. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked staff for details on a potential hybrid option and whether the <br /> reclaim light would be proposed for the west or east portion. She also asked the impact of doing <br /> a reclaim light on the eastern portion. <br /> Civil Engineer II Feriancek replied that if the subgrade soils on the east are not corrected, that <br /> would fail faster. He commented that perhaps 20 years could be gotten, but maybe not. <br /> Chairperson Riley stated that the Committee would be interested in hearing which projects would <br /> be feasible for reclaim light and acknowledged that if there are poor soils those roads would not <br /> be good for the reclaim light option. <br /> City Engineer Westby commented that staff will need to track where reclaim light is done to ensure <br /> the proper maintenance schedule is followed in the future. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff asked if it would make sense to split the project into two projects, full <br /> reclaim on the east side and reclaim light on the west side, for tracking purposes. He believed that <br /> the light reclaim will be a viable option going forward for some roads in order to complete more <br /> improvements at a lesser cost. <br /> City Engineer Westby stated that staff could figure out how to track this and would prefer to keep <br /> the entire project together. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Woestehoff, seconded by Councilmember Musgrove, to recommend <br /> City Council approval of plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for <br /> Autumn Heights Street Reconstructions, Improvement Project#22-02 with the assumption that the <br /> eastern portion will be full-depth reclaim and the western portion will be reclaim light. <br /> Further discussion: Councilmember Musgrove asked where the cul-de-sac is located and whether <br /> that would still be constructed. Civil Engineer II Feriancek replied that while the cul-de-sac is on <br /> the western portion, that portion could be full-depth in order to complete that improvement. <br /> Public Works Committee/June 21, 2022 <br /> Page 7 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.