Laserfiche WebLink
concept and although he had questions in the beginning, he does understand that this would fit <br />better under the standards of the E-3 district. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Walker, Peters, Anderson, <br />Gengler, Hunt, and VanScoy. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br />Motion by Commissioner Peters, seconded by Commissioner Walker, to recommend that City <br />Council adopt Ordinance #22-22 Amending Section 117-124(b) of City Code to Allow Medical <br />Clinics as a Permitted Use in the E-3 Employment District. <br />Further discussion <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked the current zoning districts that would allow this type of medical <br />use. Planning Manager Larson replied that B-1 and B-2 currently allow medical clinic uses. He <br />stated that the rational to adding the use to E-3, would be that medical clinics do employ people <br />and therefore an employment district would seem to be an appropriate fit. He stated that later <br />tonight the Commission will have a discussion related to the zoning districts and some issues with <br />terminology. He confirmed that the change would apply across the E-3 district. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Peters, Walker, Anderson, <br />Gengler, Hunt, and VanScoy. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br />6.02: Public Hearing: Armstrong Boulevard Interchange/Highway 10 Signage Overlay <br />District Zoning Code Text Amendment <br />Public Hearing <br />Chairperson Bauer called the public hearing to order at 7:20 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />Planning Manager Larson presented the staff report stating that staff recommends approval of the <br />proposed Code Amendment, Ordinance #22-20. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked for details on how the park would be protected from signage. <br />Planning Manager Larson replied that the park land is within the proposed district boundaries, but <br />it is a more open area and therefore a business would most likely not desire higher signage in that <br />area. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if Anoka County was involved in these discussions. <br />Planning Manager Larson replied that the County did provide some comments but did not provide <br />further participation. He noted that the area more impacted is closer to Sunfish Lake Boulevard. <br />Citizen Input <br />Planning Commission/ June 23, 2022 <br />Page 4 of 19 <br />