Laserfiche WebLink
<br />expenses such as citations were deemed not necessary until the application has gone through the <br />proper reviews. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the applicant has been cooperating with Staff. <br /> <br />City Planner McCann replied yes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the owner would want to address the truck noise. <br /> <br />Jeff Hillman, 6131 Green Valley Road, stated he is the owner of J. Hill and the property. He stated <br />the truck does have a beeper on it but if it is that, it isn’t very loud. He stated the neighbor that <br />came forward are in an adjacent neighborhood. He stated truck noise is during daytime working <br />hours. He stated there is farm equipment on the property but that will be dissipating in the near <br />future. He thought the loud beeping could be from a skid loader, not a truck. He stated they are <br />working with the City to get the fire compliance. He stated they are not operating the business out <br />of the property. He stated he has never had a problem with OSHA. He stated there has been a lot <br />of pushback from the neighborhood to the north. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman asked what kind of trucks come in for delivery. <br /> <br />Mr. Hillman replied most are their trucks but there have been dock trucks coming back and forth <br />for the storage building, which was preapproved for the warehouse. He stated they are trying to <br />get the manufacturing part in the same building so things don’t have to be transported back and <br />forth. He stated the main concern has been compliance with fire issues and a few other issues, <br />which they are taking the steps to come into compliance. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Heineman, seconded by Councilmember Specht, to grant the <br />applicant’s request for an extension for a future meeting to accommodate submittal of an <br />architectural code analysis related to the request. <br /> <br />Further discussion: <br />Councilmember Howell suggested a friendly amendment to add July 12, 2022 or later. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff asked if that would conflict with the 120-day rule or if because it is <br />from the applicant, it is a non-issue. City Planner McCann replied the 120-day rule goes to July <br />22, 2022 so it doesn’t conflict with that if it goes to the July 12, 2022 meeting. He added if the <br />applicant would like to waive the 120-day timeline rule that is a possibility. <br /> <br />Amended motion by Councilmember Heineman, seconded by Councilmember Specht, to grant the <br />applicant’s request for an extension to the July 12, 2022 City Council meeting to accommodate <br />submittal of an architectural code analysis related to the request. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Kuzma, Councilmembers Heineman, Specht, Howell, <br />Musgrove, Riley, and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. <br />City Council /June 14, 2022 <br />Page 10 of 17 <br /> <br />