Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Fincher addressed some of the comments. He stated stormwater has been discussed at <br />Planning Commission meetings and ensure concerns are heard by Staff and at the Lower Rum <br />Region during their review. He deferred to the review process for the final approval of the <br />stormwater design. He stated several comments were made tonight regarding the retention pond <br />capacity that are untrue. He stated there are standards that the City has as well as the Lower Rum <br />Region that need to be met. He stated drawings have been resubmitted and are under review. He <br />stated he thought the team has done great job of listening to the neighbor’s comments and that <br />PACT wants to be a good neighbor. He stated he needed to correct himself, that at the last Planning <br />Commission meeting he did say 15 busses, but it is 12 busses as shown on the plan. He stated as <br />st <br />far as traffic flow and lining up on 161 SRF’s traffic memo speaks to that and based off of their <br />analysis they anticipate needing queuing up of 40 cars for parent pick up. He stated they have <br />other alternatives on the site to que additional cars on the east side and northwest side of the site. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht commented he appreciated all the work that has gone into this and all the <br />feedback from the residents which helps make it a great project. He stated the experts can be <br />trusted and will hear what the Lower Rum has to say and the other groups. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Specht, seconded by Councilmember Musgrove, to adopt Resolution <br />#22-125 with the understanding that they are going to be going through the Lower Rum River <br />Water Management Organization (LRRWMO) process as well and knowing that there could be <br />discussion about the parcel and if there is agreed upon changes that Staff and PACT would see as <br />beneficial. <br /> <br />Further discussion: <br />Councilmember Musgrove offered a friendly amendment to include Staff comments, the Lower <br />Rum River Water Management Organization and park land. Councilmember Specht asked if she <br />was saying that all three of those are discussed. Councilmember Musgrove replied no, that all <br />three of those are included specifically for contingencies. She wasn’t sure if all three were <br />included. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley stated that a comment was made that the Fire Department hasn’t looked at <br />this and asked if that is true or if this plan been approved. <br /> <br />City Administrator Hagen replied the Fire Department is included in what is called the <br />development review committee so they have been reviewing this project from early on. He <br />continued the Fire Department have had an opportunity to review the site plan and plat and provide <br />feedback so their comments would have been included. He stated beyond this, when the building <br />comes in for a building permit the Fire Department will review it from a fire suppression <br />standpoint, emergency exits and such as well. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley commented that it looks like there are 30 Staff comments still open and <br />asked if it is the case those have all been cleared or new plans have come in that would address <br />those. <br /> <br />City Administrator Hagen replied they have not received another revision of plans so that is one <br />of the conditions as a part of approval is compliance with Staff review comments. He stated that <br />City Council /July 12, 2022 <br />Page 15 of 22 <br /> <br />