Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Senior Planner Anderson stated that will come with further plan development, should that step f <br /> p P � p o I <br /> the process be reached. He noted that there is concern from neighboring property owners related <br /> to lighting and noise. He stated that a noise study could be required to determine where a stadium <br /> use would fit and inform mitigation strategies. <br /> I: <br /> Commissioner Walker stated that two traffic studies were done related to the Trott Brook <br /> development. He asked if there is data on the traffic from the study related to traffic turning from <br /> Variolite onto 161'. He noted that would have been an opportunity to complete a more holistic <br /> study of the corridor rather than completing studies in small areas. <br /> Senior Planner Anderson replied that when the City initiated its traffic study in relation to E <br /> residential developments north, there were no formal applications to identify what might come <br /> forward for this site. He stated that without a specific proposal, it would have been hard to <br /> accurately include the parcel in the study. <br /> A <br /> Commissioner Walker stated that if this project moves forward,he would like to see a traffic study <br /> completed by the consultants that completed the City's Trott Brook study in order to have a <br /> detailed traffic report on this whole area. <br /> I <br /> c <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff stated that when Trott Brook North was reviewed at the last meeting, I' <br /> it did include the most up to date study and there were comments on a school going northbound, <br /> but not at that particular intersection. He agreed that the same consultant should be used to analyze <br /> the traffic for this proposal. <br /> Community Development Director Hagen stated that the traffic study is a public document that [, <br /> can be shared with the developer. <br /> Citizen Input <br /> Justin Fincher,representing the applicant, stated that PACT has hired his film as the Development <br /> Manager for the project. He stated that he is present to answer any questions related to the <br /> proposed development and sketch plan. He stated that PACT is in its 27th year of operation and is <br /> a public charter school with open enrollment to the public. He stated that there are not additional <br /> enrollment fees and enrollment is capped based on the size of the facility. He noted that the school <br /> has been in Ramsey for 18 years and considers itself an asset to the community. He stated that of <br /> the existing student body, over half the students are Ramsey residents and of those students, over ; <br /> 80 percent live within a three-mile radius of the site. He stated that there is demand for enrollment <br /> at the school and this proposed expansion would allow more opportunity. He stated that the school <br /> wants to continue to expand within Ramsey to cater to the current student body and its wait list. <br /> He recognized that this is in a residential area but would also provide for safety of students and the F <br /> surrounding community. He commented that they are willing to work with the City on a traffic E <br /> study. He noted that the peak demand hours for a school happen twice per day when the school <br /> f <br /> opens and closes. He stated that both periods are a 15-to-20-minute window. He recognized that <br /> there will be off peal-,extracurricular activities that will occur. He stated that this site is centrally <br /> located for PACT,its current student body,and the extensive wait list. He stated that this is already <br /> a tax-exempt property,therefore there would not be an impact to the City's tax roll. He commented <br /> Planning Commission/February 24,2022 <br /> Page 5 of 26 <br />