Laserfiche WebLink
G <br /> concept and although he had questions in the beginning, he does understand that this would fit <br /> better under the standards of the E-3 district. ,. <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Walker, Peters, Anderson, <br /> Gengler, Hunt, and VanScoy. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Peters, seconded by Commissioner Walker, to recommend that City <br /> Council adopt Ordinance #22-22 Amending Section 117-124(b) of City Code to Allow Medical <br /> Clinics as a Permitted Use in the E-3 Employment District. <br /> Further discussion <br /> i <br /> Commissioner VanScoy asked the current zoning districts that would allow this type of medical <br /> use. Planning Manager Larson replied that B-1 and B-2 currently allow medical clinic uses. He <br /> stated that the rational to adding the use to E-3, would be that medical clinics do employ people <br /> and therefore an employment district would seem to be an appropriate fit. He stated that later <br /> tonight the Commission will have a discussion related to the zoning districts and some issues with <br /> terminology. He confirmed that the change would apply across the E-3 district. <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Peters, Walker, Anderson, <br /> Gengler, Hunt, and VanScoy. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> 6.02: Public Hearing: Armstrong Boulevard Interchange/Highway 10 Signage Overlay <br /> District Zoning Code Text Amendment <br /> Public Hearing <br /> Chairperson Bauer called the public hearing to order at 7:20 p.m. <br /> Presentation <br /> Planning Manager Larson presented the staff report stating that staff recommends approval of the !, <br /> proposed Code Amendment, Ordinance#22-20. <br /> c <br /> Commissioner VanScoy asked for details on how the park would be protected from signage. <br /> 4. <br /> Planning Manager Larson replied that the park land is within the proposed district boundaries, but <br /> it is a more open area and therefore a business would most likely not desire higher Signage in that <br /> area. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy asked if Anoka County was involved in these discussions. <br /> Planning Manager Larson replied that the County did provide some comments but did not provide <br /> further participation. He noted that the area more impacted is closer to Sunfish Lake Boulevard. <br /> I' <br /> Citizen Input <br /> f <br /> Planning Commission/June 23,2022 <br /> Page 4 of 19 <br /> G <br />