Laserfiche WebLink
Approximately 20 minutes for presentation and discussion. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Staff believes that the water observed in the bottom of the trench in recent years is most likely not from storm water <br />runoff but rather groundwater rising in conjunction with the lake level rising. <br />Permits from both the DNR and the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization would be required to <br />complete the requested improvements as the settling basin and overflow would be located within wetland 114P (see <br />attached Figure 3) which requires a WMO permit, and the work would be occurring below the Ordinary High <br />Water Level which requires a permit from the DNR. In addition, wetland mitigation credits would need to be <br />purchased at a 2:1 ratio to replace the impacted wetland due to construction of the settling basin. <br />Staff estimates that construction of the proposed settling basin and restoration of the swale would cost between <br />$15,000 to $45,000, depending on the volume of stormwater to be treated, required dewatering, the cost of wetland <br />mitigation credits, and the method of turf restoration to be used for the swale. <br />At this time, the property owner is not requesting to fill the swale or vacate the easement so these costs have not <br />been considered. <br />Funding Source: <br />Funding for the City's share of any ordered improvements would be taken from the Stormwater Fund. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends that the property owner be required to pay for the requested work since it benefits the use of his <br />property. However, the City could consider contributing an amount commensurate with the estimated long-term <br />savings associated with maintaining a settling basin next to a public street versus maintaining a linear drainage <br />swale along the rear of the private property. Based on a 50 year maintenance schedule this cost would be <br />approximately $500 assuming the City would dredge and restore the turf in the swale twice, once every 25 years. <br />Action: <br />Staff is requesting Committee direction on whether this request should be considered for approval, and if so, <br />whether the City should contribute anything towards the project. If the Committee is in agreement with the request, <br />Staff would request that the Committee provide a formal recommendation for the City Council since this item <br />would require Council approval as it is not a budgeted work task. <br />Figure 1 <br />Figure 2 <br />Sunwood Dr Plan <br />DNR EAW Rvw Ltr <br />Certificate of Survey <br />Figure 3 <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Grant Riemer Grant Riemer 09/10/2015 12 : 51 PM <br />Kurt Ulrich Kathy Schmitz 09/10/2015 04:12 PM <br />Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 09/10/2015 04:28 PM <br />Form Started By: Bruce Westby Started On: 09/09/2015 09:39 AM <br />Final Approval Date: 09/10/2015 <br />