My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 07/19/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2022
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 07/19/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:37:54 AM
Creation date
9/7/2022 11:00:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
07/19/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
estimated costs to the Committee for further discussion. Attached is an updated cost estimate which totals <br />$46,782.75. This includes all estimated costs required to construct the settling basin shown in attached Figure 4, to <br />construct required storm sewer modifications, to fill in the drainage swale across the rear of the Bergevin property, <br />to remove the storm sewer structure at the end of the swale on the west side of the Bergevin property, to restore all <br />disturbed areas using sod (Bergevin property only) and a wetland seed mix (all other areas), and to vacate the <br />easement the swale was located in. The estimated costs also include 10% contingency costs for unknowns and <br />miscellaneous pay items not included in the cost estimate, as well as 23% indirect costs for administrative, <br />engineering, finance, and legal fees. Staff previously estimated construction costs for the proposed settling basin <br />and restoration of the swale would cost between $15,000 and $45,000. <br />A link to this case was sent to the property owner, who indicated they will be present at the meeting Tuesday <br />evening. <br />Timeframe: <br />Approximately 20 minutes for presentation and discussion. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Staff believes that the water observed in the bottom of the swale in recent years is most likely not from storm water <br />runoff but is rather groundwater rising in conjunction with the lake level rising. <br />Permits from both the DNR and the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization would be required to <br />complete the requested improvements as the settling basin and overflow would be located within wetland 114P (see <br />attached Figure 3) which requires a WMO permit, and the work would be occurring below the Ordinary High <br />Water Level which requires a permit from the DNR. In addition, wetland mitigation credits would need to be <br />purchased at a 2:1 ratio to replace the impacted wetland due to construction of the settling basin. This is reflected in <br />the attached estimated costs. <br />Funding Source: <br />Funding for the City's share of any ordered improvements would be paid from the Stormwater Fund. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends that the property owner be required to pay for the requested work since it solely benefits the use <br />of his property. However, the City could consider contributing an amount commensurate with the estimated <br />long-term savings associated with maintaining a settling basin next to a public street versus maintaining a linear <br />drainage swale along the rear of a private property. Based on a 50 year maintenance schedule, this cost would be <br />approximately $500 assuming the City would dredge and restore the turf in the swale twice, once every 25 years. <br />If the settling basin is constructed Staff also recommends filling in and sodding the swale across the rear yard of the <br />subject property, removing the storm sewer structure on the west end of the swale, and vacating the existing <br />drainage easement that encumbered the swale and drainage structure to prevent the need to maintain this <br />infrastructure since a public purpose is no longer being served. However, the easement over the sanitary sewer line <br />on the east side of the property would still be retained. <br />Action: <br />Staff is requesting Committee direction on whether this request should be forwarded to Council for consideration <br />of approval and, if so, whether the Committee has a recommendation on whether the City should contribute <br />anything towards the project. If the Committee is in agreement with the property owner's request, Staff requests that <br />the Committee provide a formal recommendation for the City Council since this item would require Council <br />approval since it is not a budgeted project. <br />Attachments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.