Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Miske replied it was in 2014 but that was the only time. <br />City Engineer Westby suggested discussing the project further and talking to the residents to get <br />an idea of how open they would be to work with the City. Staff will verify which properties <br />would benefit, and then get an idea of how these preliminary numbers would work. <br />Mr. Miske said he understands he will have to pay something, and also understands there is no <br />value to the city. He inquired how much he will need to pay. He stated he is concerned with the <br />value of the house and whether it will be sellable. <br />Motion by Councilmember Johns, seconded by Councilmember Shryock, to recommend that the <br />City Council accept the feasibility report but deny approval of a drainage improvement project <br />pending development of a cost effective, equitable funding program. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Councilmembers Johns and Shryock. Voting <br />No: None. <br />5.02: Review Updated Estimated Costs for Sunfish Lake Sedimentation Basin <br />Improvements <br />City Engineer Westby reviewed the staff report and request of the 14520 Sunfish Lake Drive <br />NW property owner, Mr. Bergevin, that the City reconstruct specific stormwater treatment <br />improvements impacting a portion of their back yard. The requested work includes constructing <br />a settling basin at the end of the storm sewer outlet from Sunwood Drive where it intersects 145th <br />Lane NW to reduce the frequency and volume of stormwater runoff running through the drainage <br />swale along the rear of their lot. They are also requesting removal of existing cattails and other <br />vegetation commonly found in wetlands from the swale and restoring the swale to a lawn <br />condition. <br />City Engineer Westby reviewed past consideration and discussion of this ongoing situation and <br />noted the swale is working as it was intended to work. Staff believes the water in the bottom of <br />the swale in recent years is due to groundwater rising in conjunction with the lake level rising. <br />City Engineer Westby stated staff recommends the property owner be required to pay for the <br />requested work since it solely benefits the use of his private property. However, the City could <br />consider contributing an amount commensurate with the estimated long-term saving associated <br />with maintaining a settling basin next to a public street versus maintaining a linear drainage <br />swale along the rear of a private property. Based on a 50-year maintenance schedule, this cost <br />would be approximately $500 assuming the City would dredge and restore the turf in the swale <br />twice, once every 25 years. <br />Chairperson Riley noted the largest number in the costs is the wetland mitigation. He questioned <br />what is being replaced and where the basin is going. <br />Public Works Committee / June 21, 2016 <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />