My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 08/08/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council - 08/08/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:32:25 AM
Creation date
9/26/2022 1:35:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/08/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Acting Mayor Riley asked City Engineer/Interim Public Works Director Westby if he wished to <br />add anything to the discussion. <br /> <br />City Engineer/Interim Public Works Director Westby indicated what City Administrator Hagen <br />had said was accurate and the applicant did add the restroom request during the process. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Howell to collect fees identified and invoices sent by the City’s finance <br />department. <br /> <br />Motion failed for lack of a second. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht asked what happens if they do not decide either option if it would just <br />revert to default. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff said if that happens then they will find a compromise. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Riley said that if they do nothing, then these fees have already been billed. <br /> <br />City Attorney Fritz Knaak noted there is a provision in the City charter that any resolution, <br />ordinance, or motion does need four yes votes to pass. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff said that he would like to offer a compromise that they do not charge <br />the $97.82. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Riley agreed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht asked what the legal side would be if they did nothing. <br /> <br />City Attorney Fritz Knaak said that nothing would happen. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht clarified that it would revert to the $398.62 all being charged. <br /> <br />City Attorney Fritz Knaak said that was correct. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht said that he would like all fees reduced; however, if they could just reduce <br />a part, he would be open to that compromise. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Woestehoff, seconded by Councilmember Specht, to not invoice St. <br />Katherine Drexel the $97.83 but keep previously paid amounts. <br /> <br />Further discussion: <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Riley said this seems like a compromise; however, the City is mostly made whole <br />and he thinks this makes sense. Councilmember Howell said that this seems a little bit arbitrary. <br /> <br />City Council / August 8, 2022 <br />Page 7 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.