My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:38:06 PM
Creation date
9/27/2022 9:03:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
883
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
If a recipient intends to fund capital expenditures in response to the public health impacts <br />of the pandemic, recipients should refer to the section Capital Expenditures for details about the <br />eligibility of capital expenditures. <br />Standards: Designating a Negative Economic Impact <br />Public Comment: Many commenters expressed uncertainty about how to determine <br />whether uses of funds, beyond those specifically enumerated as eligible, might be eligible <br />responses to negative economic impacts. For example, many commenters submitted questions <br />asking whether specific uses of funds would be eligible. Others described what they considered <br />to be impacts of the pandemic and argued that uses of funds to respond to these issues should be <br />eligible. Some commenters requested that Treasury provide additional detail to guide their <br />assessments of eligible uses of funds. These comments ranged in their specificity and covered <br />the full range of eligible uses to respond to negative economic impacts. Several commenters <br />asked for clarification about what types of food assistance would be considered eligible. Another <br />commenter requested that the establishment of outdoor dining be eligible. Many commenters <br />inquired about homeless shelters as an eligible use of SLFRF funds. <br />Commenters also expressed uncertainty about the ability to establish classes, including <br />geographic areas, that experienced a negative economic impact or disagreed with the <br />requirement that an individual entity be impacted by the pandemic in order to receive assistance. <br />For example, a commenter argued that interventions should not be limited to individuals or <br />businesses that experienced an economic impact and should instead be used broadly to support <br />economic growth. These commenters argued that an expenditure that supports a more robust <br />economy may help combat the pandemic's negative economic impacts, and it can do so even if <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.