My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:38:06 PM
Creation date
9/27/2022 9:03:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
883
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
experienced a negative economic impact or harm. For example, the interim final rule allowed, <br />and the final rule maintains the ability for, recipients to demonstrate a negative economic impact <br />on a population or group, referred to as a "class," and to provide assistance to households, small <br />businesses, or nonprofits that fall within that class. In such cases, the recipient need only <br />demonstrate that the household, small business, or nonprofit is within the class that experienced a <br />negative economic impact, see section Standards: Designating Other Impacted Classes. This <br />would allow, for example, an internet access assistance program for all households with children <br />to support those households' ability to participate in healthcare, work, and educational activities <br />like extending learning opportunities, among other critical activities. In that case, the recipient <br />would only need to identify a negative economic impact to the class of "households with <br />children" and would not need to document or otherwise demonstrate that each individual <br />household served experienced a negative economic impact. <br />Second, the response must be designed to address the identified economic harm or impact <br />resulting from or exacerbated by the public health emergency. In selecting responses, the <br />recipient must assess whether, and the extent to which, the use would respond to or address this <br />harm or impact. This approach is consistent with the text of the statute, which provides that funds <br />may be used to "respond to" the "negative economic impacts" of the public health emergency <br />"including assistance to households, small businesses, and nonprofits, or aid to impacted <br />industries such as tourism, travel, and hospitality." The list of potential responses ("assistance" <br />or "aid") suggests that responses should address the "negative economic impacts" of particular <br />types of beneficiaries (e.g., households or small businesses). <br />Responses must be reasonably designed to benefit the individual or class that experienced <br />the negative economic impact or harm. Uses of funds should be assessed based on their <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.