My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:38:06 PM
Creation date
9/27/2022 9:03:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
883
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Opportunity Zones, Difficult Development Areas (DDAs), areas with a certain amount of Real <br />Estate Advantage Program (REAP) recipients, or use of eligibility criteria from the Community <br />Reinvestment Act. One commenter generally recommended that a clearer definition of <br />"disproportionately impacted" should be provided and that any definition should include <br />communities of color and people of limited means. Another recommended specific eligibility for <br />people that had recently interacted with the criminal justice system. Many commenters <br />representing Tribal governments and groups recommended a presumption of eligibility for all <br />Tribal uses of funds, clarification that off reservation members remained eligible, and broad <br />flexibility on use of funds. <br />Additionally, commenters noted that some areas are technically eligible to be QCTs but <br />fall short because of the aggregate population of eligible tracts. One commenter noted that these <br />areas should be considered the same as QCTs for the purpose of SLFRF funds. Some <br />commenters argued that rural counties typically have few QCTs despite high levels of poverty <br />and disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Other rural commenters recommended that <br />the designation be by county rather than at a more granular level, arguing that the QCT <br />designation is biased towards urban areas and understates the harm done to rural America. Many <br />commenters representing Tribal governments supported the presumption that services provided <br />by Tribal governments respond to disproportionate impacts. <br />Treasury Response: <br />Summary: While households residing in QCTs or served by Tribal governments were <br />presumed to be disproportionately impacted, Treasury emphasizes that under the interim final <br />rule recipients could also identify other households, populations, or geographic areas that were <br />disproportionately impacted by the pandemic and provide services to respond. <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.