My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:38:06 PM
Creation date
9/27/2022 9:03:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
883
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Additionally, as noted above, Treasury is finalizing the rule with some changes to the <br />treatment of affordable housing development designed to clarify that permanent supportive <br />housing or other programs or services to improve access to stable, affordable housing among <br />individuals who are homeless, and the development of affordable housing to increase supply of <br />affordable and high -quality living units, are responsive to individuals and households that were <br />impacted by the pandemic in addition to those that were disproportionately impacted. This shift <br />is in line with commenters' recommendations and consistent with the facts described above, <br />which demonstrate that lack of supply of affordable housing units contributed to the pandemic's <br />impact on housing insecurity and unsustainable housing cost burdens and that these impacts were <br />experienced broadly across the country. <br />Public Comment: Eligible Activities: Many commenters asked for clarity on what types <br />of activities (e.g., land acquisition, construction, pre -construction costs, operating costs, etc.) are <br />eligible uses of SLFRF, and what affordability criteria must be applied to affordable housing <br />development. Commenters encouraged Treasury to allow the full array of affordable housing <br />activities, including particular requests for broad flexibility for Tribal communities, and to <br />specify that "development" should include construction, preservation, rehabilitation, and <br />operation. Other commenters requested clarification about permissible program administration <br />approaches for affordable housing, such as contracting methods and distribution of funds. <br />Some commenters asked that Treasury require SLFRF funds to be focused on the lowest - <br />income households, who suffer the most severe rent burdens and risks of housing instability, and <br />whose housing situation has left them particularly vulnerable to COVID-19. For example, one <br />commenter argued that SLFRF funds should only be used to support affordable housing for <br />households making 50 percent of AMI or less and that recipients should be required to set aside <br />105 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.