My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:38:06 PM
Creation date
9/27/2022 9:03:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
883
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
during a labor dispute, as this would not constitute responding to the public health or negative <br />economic impacts of the pandemic. Further, recipients must ensure that its hiring practices do not <br />violate conflict -of -interest policies.245 Total compensation for a hired employee that is <br />substantially in excess of typical compensation for employees of their experience and tenure <br />within the recipient's government, without a corresponding business case, may indicate a <br />potential conflict -of -interest in fact or appearance. <br />Providing additional funding for employees who experienced pay cuts and furloughs. In <br />recognition of the economic hardship caused by pay cuts and furloughs, additional funds may be <br />provided to employees who experienced pay cuts or were furloughed since the onset of the <br />pandemic on January 27, 2020. Recipients must be able to substantiate that the pay cut or <br />furlough was substantially due to the public health emergency or its negative economic impacts <br />(e.g., fiscal pressures on state and local budgets) and should document their assessment. As a <br />reminder, this additional funding must be reasonably proportional to the negative economic <br />impact of the pay cut or furlough on the employee, which would include taking into account <br />unemployment insurance (UI) benefits that a furloughed employee may have received during the <br />furloughed period. Treasury presumes that additional funds beyond the difference in pay had the <br />employee not received a pay cut or been furloughed would not be reasonably proportional. <br />Recipients may also provide premium pay to certain employees, as detailed further in <br />section Premium Pay. <br />245 As part of accepting the Award Terms and Conditions for SLFRF, each recipient agreed to maintain a conflict -of - <br />interest policy consistent with 2 C.F.R. § 200.318(c)112 that is applicable to all activities funded with the SLFRF <br />award. Pursuant to this policy, decisions concerning SLFRF must be free of undisclosed personal or organizational <br />conflicts of interest, both in fact and in appearance. A recipient may not use control over SLFRF for their own <br />private gain. Furthermore, no employee, officer, or agent may participate in the selection, award, or administration <br />of a contract supported by a federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. <br />183 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.