Laserfiche WebLink
that some of these sites serve as remote vaccination sites or are otherwise crucial to the pandemic <br />public health response. <br />Commenters also requested use of funds for capital expenditures that support community <br />needs apart from health care, such as new construction or improvements to schools, affordable <br />housing (beyond presumed disproportionately impacted communities), childcare facilities, and <br />community centers; some suggested that all types of projects permissible under the Community <br />Development Block Grant Program should be eligible both for policy and administrability <br />reasons. Further, some commenters also asked for clarification as to whether parks and <br />recreational facilities are eligible if built in certain disproportionately impacted areas, as well as <br />public transportation infrastructure. <br />Finally, some commenters also requested use of funds for capital expenditures in <br />government administration buildings, such as public courthouses, as well as technology <br />infrastructure that would allow for remote delivery of public benefits. Others also asked about <br />whether funds could be used to renovate vacant business district buildings or commercial spaces <br />to spur economic recovery. <br />Treasury Response: Capital expenditures, in certain cases, can be appropriate responses <br />to the public health and economic impacts of the pandemic, in addition to programs and services. <br />Like other eligible uses of SLFRF funds in this category, capital expenditures should be a related <br />and reasonably proportional response to a public health or negative economic impact of the <br />pandemic. The final rule clarifies and expands how SLFRF funds may be used for certain capital <br />expenditures, including criteria and documentation requirements specified in this section, as <br />applicable. <br />192 <br />