My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:38:06 PM
Creation date
9/27/2022 9:03:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
883
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As a result of their limited administrative capacity and unique and complex rules and <br />regulations applicable to Tribal governments operating on Tribal Trust Lands, Tribal <br />governments would experience significant and redundant administrative burden by also being <br />required to complete a Written Justification for applicable capital expenditures. While Tribal <br />governments are not required to complete the Written Justification for applicable capital <br />expenditures, the associated substantive requirements continue to apply, including the <br />requirement that a capital expenditure must be reasonably designed to benefit the individual or <br />class that experienced the identified impact or harm and must be related and reasonably <br />proportional to the extent and type of impact or harm. Note that, as a general matter, Treasury <br />may also request further information on SLFRF expenditures and projects, including capital <br />expenditures, as part of the regular SLFRF reporting and compliance process, including to assess <br />their eligibility under the final rule. <br />The Written Justification should (1) describe the harm or need to be addressed; (2) <br />explain why a capital expenditure is appropriate to address the harm or need; and (3) compare <br />the proposed capital expenditure against alternative capital expenditures that could be made. The <br />information required for the Written Justification reflects the framework applicable to all uses <br />under the public health and negative economic impacts eligible use category, providing <br />justification for the reasonable design, relatedness, and reasonable proportionality of the capital <br />expenditure in response to the harm or impact identified. <br />1. Description of harm or need to be addressed: Recipients should provide a description of <br />the specific harm or need to be addressed, and why the harm was exacerbated or caused <br />by the public health emergency. When appropriate, recipients may provide quantitative <br />196 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.