Laserfiche WebLink
revenue compared to the counterfactual estimate. The interim final rule invited comments on <br />whether Treasury should revise its presumption to "take into account other factors, including <br />actions taken by the recipient as well as the expiration of the COVID-19 public health <br />emergency, in determining whether to presume that revenue losses are 'due to' the COVID-19 <br />public health emergency." <br />Treasury received a substantial number of comments on the revenue loss provisions set <br />forth in the interim final rule. These comments largely pertained to the following topics: the <br />overall methodology for calculating revenue loss; the definition of "revenue"; whether revenue <br />should be aggregated or calculated on some alternative basis (e.g., source -by -source or fund -by - <br />fund); the appropriate calculation dates (i.e., fiscal year or calendar year); the presumption that <br />all revenue loss is due to the pandemic; the base year; and the definition of "government <br />services." <br />Overall Methodology for Calculating Revenue Loss <br />As noted above, the interim final rule provided a formula for recipients to calculate <br />revenue loss by comparing actual revenues received during a given time -period with a <br />counterfactual amount of revenue based on revenues in the base year and an adjustment for <br />expected growth in revenue each year. <br />Public Comment: Treasury received many public comments on the overall methodology <br />for calculating revenue loss. Some recipients, including smaller governments, have expressed <br />concern regarding the burden associated with the calculation of revenue loss, particularly the <br />burden involved in calculating the amount of general revenue, given that the definition of general <br />revenue in the interim final rule does not always align with the definition of revenue already <br />239 <br />