Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Anderson referenced the north and west edges, where buffering was discussed, and <br />asked for more details. <br />Mr. Wolf provided details on the proposed landscaping plan which would include a berm, trees, <br />and plantings. <br />Anna Schmidt, 6245 172nd Lane NW, stated that her biggest concern was the potential noise level. <br />She noted that most of the time that she has lived on the property she has not been impacted by the <br />greenhouse but was impacted by the fan and machinery noise in the past few years. She stated <br />that concern has been addressed by the applicant. She referenced the park preserve along Trott <br />Brook and asked if this would impact the development of that park area. <br />Senior Planner Anderson replied that this project will not have merit on that. He noted that the <br />City does have a goal to have a continuous corridor along Trott Brook and has been successful in <br />obtaining fee title and/or trail easements along Trott Brook. He noted that the previous application <br />from Green Valley Greenhouse included that easement. He. was unsure of the plans to construct a <br />trail along the corridor but noted that the City continues to review options for public benefit as <br />projects continue to come forward in the corridor. <br />Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner walker, to close the public <br />hearing. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Anderson, walker, Gengler, <br />Hunt, and Peters. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner VanScoy. <br />Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 7:55 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Chairperson Bauer noted that the first action would be related to sketch plan and final plat, both <br />of which do not require formal action from the Commission and asked for input from the group. <br />Commissioner Gengler referenced the southernmost lot against Nowthen Boulevard. She stated <br />that it is her understanding that is not part of the expansion plans but is property that is being used <br />in the trade out of properties. <br />Senior Planner Anderson confirmed that is correct. He noted that parcel would be connected to <br />the Hunt property that currently has a home on it. <br />Chairperson Bauer stated that the record can reflect that there were no concerns with the sketch <br />plan and final plat. He moved to the action items before the Commission. <br />Commissioner Anderson recognized the position the City is in with the Metropolitan Council <br />related to density and asked if this would create any additional issues. <br />Planning Commission/ July 28, 2022 <br />Page 8 of 13 <br />