Laserfiche WebLink
which may include a reasonable projection of increased need, whether due to population growth <br />or otherwise and (2) a cost-effective means for meeting that need, taking into account available <br />alternatives. In addition, given that drinking water is a resource that is subject to depletion, in the <br />case of investments in infrastructure that supply drinking water in order to meet projected <br />population growth, the project must be projected to be sustainable over its estimated useful life. <br />Not included in the list of criteria above is the requirement in the interim final rule that <br />the project be unlikely to be made using private sources of funds. Given that it may be difficult <br />to assess in a particular case what the probability of private investment in a project would be, <br />Treasury has eliminated this standard from the meaning of necessary but still encourages <br />recipients to prioritize projects that would provide the greatest public benefit in their respective <br />jurisdictions. <br />Strong Labor Standards in Water, Sewer, and Broadband Construction <br />As stated in the Supplementary Information to the interim final rule, Treasury encourages <br />recipients to carry out investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure in ways that <br />produce high -quality infrastructure, avert disruptive and costly delays, and promote efficiency.301 <br />Treasury encourages recipients to use strong labor standards, including project labor agreements <br />(PLAs) and community benefits agreements that offer wages at or above the prevailing rate and <br />include local hire provisions. Treasury also recommends that recipients prioritize in their <br />301 Treasury received several comments related to its encouragement of certain wage and labor standards in the <br />Supplementary Information to the interim final rule. Some commenters opposed this encouragement, arguing that <br />even encouragement and reference to PLAs and prevailing wage laws could lead to confusion or make it more likely <br />that recipients would apply labor standards in ways that would discourage competition and raise project costs. <br />Conversely, some commenters supported the encouragement of the use of certain standards, including giving <br />preference to employers that meet certain employment standards (e.g., those that maintain high safety and training <br />standards) because it would support the goal of completing water, sewer, and broadband projects efficiently and <br />safely. As in the interim final rule, this encouragement does not impose a legally binding restriction on recipients. <br />262 <br />