Laserfiche WebLink
sources of funds that have been used to permissibly offset the total value of covered tax <br />changes other than SLFRF funds. These are: <br />o State or territory tax changes that would increase any source of general fund <br />revenue, such as a change that would increase a tax rate; and <br />o Spending cuts in areas not being replaced by SLFRF funds. <br />The recipient government will calculate the value of revenue reduction remaining after <br />applying these sources of offsetting funding to the total value of revenue reducing <br />changes that is, how much of the tax change has not been paid for. The recipient <br />government will then compare that value to the difference between the baseline and <br />actual tax revenue. A recipient government will not be required to repay to Treasury an <br />amount that is greater than the recipient government's actual tax revenue shortfall relative <br />to the baseline (i.e., fiscal year 2019 tax revenue adjusted for inflation). This "revenue <br />reduction cap," together with Step 3, ensures that recipient governments can use organic <br />revenue growth to offset the cost of revenue reductions. <br />• Finally, if there are any amounts that could be subject to recoupment, Treasury will <br />provide notice to the recipient government of such amounts along with an explanation of <br />such amounts. This process is discussed in greater detail in section Remediation and <br />Recoupment of this Supplementary Information. <br />Together, these steps allow Treasury to identify the amount of reduction in net tax <br />revenue that both is attributable to covered changes and has been directly or indirectly offset <br />with SLFRF funds. <br />Overview of Comments: Many commenters supported the framework established under <br />the interim final rule. These commenters argued that the offset provision, and the interim final <br />318 <br />