My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:38:06 PM
Creation date
9/27/2022 9:03:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
883
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Following release of the interim final rule, Treasury issued Compliance and Reporting <br />Guidance that provided that "recipients may use funds for administering the SLFRF program, <br />including costs of consultants to support effective management and oversight, including <br />consultation for ensuring compliance with legal, regulatory, and other requirements. Further, <br />costs must be reasonable and allocable as outlined in 2 CFR 200.404 and 2 CFR 200.405. <br />Pursuant to the SLFRF Award Terms and Conditions, recipients are permitted to charge both <br />direct and indirect costs to their SLFRF award as administrative costs. Direct costs are those that <br />are identified specifically as costs of implementing the SLFRF program objectives, such as <br />contract support, materials, and supplies for a project. Indirect costs are general overhead costs <br />of an organization where a portion of such costs are [sic] allocable to the SLFRF award such as <br />the cost of facilities or administrative functions like a director's office."378 Several commenters <br />requested clarity on which administrative expenses are permissible uses of funds and how <br />recipients should structure administrative costs. <br />In the final rule, Treasury is clarifying that direct and indirect administrative expenses are <br />permissible uses of SLFRF funds and are a separate eligible use category from "[e]xpenses to <br />improve efficacy of public health or economic relief programs," which refers to efforts to <br />improve the effectiveness of public health and economic programs through use of data, evidence, <br />and targeted consumer outreach. For details on permissible direct and indirect administrative <br />costs, recipients should refer to Treasury's Compliance and Reporting Guidance.379 Costs <br />incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances must be treated consistently as either direct <br />or indirect costs. <br />378 U.S. Department of the Treasury, Recipient Compliance and Reporting Responsibilities, as of November 5, 2021; <br />https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-state-local-and-tribal-governments/state-and- <br />local-fiscal-recovery-funds/recipient-compliance-and-reporting-responsibilities. <br />379 Id. <br />365 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.