My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:38:06 PM
Creation date
9/27/2022 9:03:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
883
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Senior Planner Anderson provided those calculations, noting about 550 square feet over what <br />would be allowed. He noted that would include the 10 by 10 shed. <br />Commissioner Anderson asked if the Commission were to approve a building of 30 by 40 feet, but <br />the applicant discovered he actually needed a building 30 by 50, would the applicant then need to <br />go through the entire process again. <br />Senior Planner Anderson confirmed that the entire process would begin again including notice for <br />the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Hunt acknowledged that if the property were slightly larger, additional square <br />footage would be allowed, and asked if the number of accessory structures allowed would also <br />increase. <br />Senior Planner Anderson replied that the number of allowed accessory structures would not <br />increase. He stated that the applicant did investigate the option of attaching a building, but the <br />cost was prohibitive because of the frost footings that would be required. He stated that staff <br />worked with the applicant in attempt to avoid how this CUP process could have been avoided. <br />Commissioner Walker commented that adding additional space to an accessory building at a later <br />date would be cost prohibitive and that is why he would advocate for increasing the size of the <br />building to 30 by 50 feet, with elimination of the 10 by 10 shed in return. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that the Commission is discussing options that would add cost to <br />the project and asked the applicant for input. He noted that it seems the Commission would support <br />a slightly larger structure but believed the applicant should provide input on whether that would <br />be affordable or something he would be interested in. <br />Mr. Doble replied that he would have to price out that but agreed that it would be nice to store <br />everything in the one accessory building. He stated that he would support that option. <br />Senior Planner Anderson commented that the CUP could be reworded to allow up to a certain <br />square footage which would provide the flexibility for the applicant to increase the size of the <br />building. He asked if the shed would need to be removed if the size of the building were increased <br />and whether the shed could remain if the building is kept at the proposed size. <br />Mr. Doble confirmed that he would like that flexibility. <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Walker, to close the public <br />hearing. <br />A roll call vote was performed: <br />Commissioner Hunt aye <br />Commissioner Anderson aye <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.