Laserfiche WebLink
Pool Patio Encroachment <br />A pool permit was approved in 2006 for the construction of the pool in the rear yard. The plan did not include a <br />concrete patio that encroaches into the rear drainage and uiltiy easement, as well as the rear setback requirement for <br />the R-1 (MUSA) district. The Applicants are proposing to include the patio encroachment with the structure <br />encroachment in the agreement. If the Easement Encroachment Agreement is approved, the Applicants will need to <br />apply for a Variance to the rear setback from the Planning Commission, and receive a zoning permit with <br />after -the -fact fees applied (twice the permit fee) for the patio addition. Aerial photos, a copy of the permit, and the <br />approved pool plan are attached to this case.are attached to this case for reference. <br />Sport Court <br />Aerial photography shows a playground and sandbox in 2011, and a sport court in 2014. Sport courts and other <br />impervious surfaces require a zoning permit at time of construction, and this was the same standard when the <br />playground was converted between 2011 and 2014. A zoning permit will be required for the sport court with <br />after -the -fact fees applied (twice the permit cost), regardless of the outcome for the Easement Encroachment <br />Agreement. Aerial photos are attached to this case for reference. <br />City Code Sections <br />• 105-55 (Swimming Pools and Spas -Accessory Uses and Buildings) <br />• 117-349 (Accessory Uses and Buildings) <br />• 117- 111 (R- 1 Residential District). <br />Alternatives <br />Alternative 1: Deny the request for an Easement Encroachment Agreement for the structure and pool patio. The <br />Applicant purchased the structure prior to receiving approvals, and were relayed this standard according to their <br />structure manufacturer. The pool patio was constructed outside of approved plans associated with the pool permit in <br />2006. The sport court was also constructed without a zoning permit between 2011 and 2014, and will require a <br />permit to resolve this. City Staff are supportive of this alternative. <br />Alternative 2: Approve the Easement Encroachment Agreement for the structure and pool patio within the rear <br />drainage and utility easement on the Subject Property. The Applicants would be allowed to proceed with the <br />proposed location for the structure in the rear drainage and utility easement, and for the pool patio construction that <br />does not meet approved plans for the pool from 2006. The Applicants would be required to apply for permits for the <br />pool patio and sport court. A Variance would be required for the rear setback for the pool patio, and after -the -fact <br />fees (twice the permit cost) would be applied for permits for the sport court and pool patio permits. City Staff are <br />not supportive of this alternative. <br />Funding Source: <br />The Applicant is responsible for all costs associated with this project and review. <br />Recommendation: <br />City Staff recommend adopting Resolution #22-212 denying an Easement Encroachment Agreement at 7160 148th <br />Ln NW. <br />Action: <br />Motion to adopt Resolution #22-212 denying an Easement Encroachment Agreement for at 7160 148th Ln NW. <br />Attachments <br />Site Location Map <br />Land Use Application <br />Aerial Photos (2005-2020) <br />Approved Pool Permit and Plans <br />