Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Anderson commented that there are times accessory structures are placed in the <br />wrong location and therefore he would still want checks and balances. <br />Planning Manager Larson replied that the zoning permit does not have inspection, so it is still up <br />to the resident to properly place the shed on the property. <br />Senior Planner Anderson stated that typically the very same process is followed in the sense that <br />the resident would reach out and ask questions about what they want to do. He stated that what <br />would change is that the resident would not have to formally submit the plan that goes through the <br />plan review system, which is then reviewed by planning and engineering. He stated that if there <br />is an issue related to placement, staff would not know about the issue until there is a complaint <br />which is the same whether a zoning permit was required or not. He stated that the only thing that <br />would change is the review of the permit and issuance of the permit. He stated that in most cases <br />residents do reach out to the City to determine if there is anything they need to know but there will <br />always be property owners that do what they want. He stated that the enforcement side would not <br />change whether or not there was a permit issued. <br />Commissioner Walker asked if it would be possible to keep the permit only for the fact of <br />providing rules and regulations. He stated that the City would know what is going on for tracking <br />purposes. He commented that would make it easier for staff to know which properties may need <br />to be followed up on for code enforcement. He stated that he would still agree with removing the <br />need for plan submittal and staff review. He agreed that some residents will continue to do things <br />without permits, but for those that do apply for the permit, they could still be given the applicable <br />rules. <br />Planning Manager Larson commented that part of this is also the value of the $25. He stated that <br />in that scenario the resident would be paying $25 to receive the rules, which are also available for <br />free on the website. He stated that Brooklyn Park does not have this type of permit. He stated that <br />it was the personable responsibility of the resident to follow the rules and code enforcement would <br />be used for those that do not follow the rules. He stated that this would be a better service to the <br />residents rather than requiring them to go through all the steps without an inspection to know it <br />was done right. He commented that the $25 fee does not even begin to cover the cost for staff <br />review as well as the added delay to residents. He stated that if the cost is increased to better cover <br />the staff cost, more people will skip the step of getting a permit. <br />Acting Chairperson Gengler commented that this seems beneficial to both residents and staff. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated that using the data, there have been about 100 zoning permits <br />per year, and he would believe that there are many more residents completing these projects <br />without permits. He asked the time staff is spending on these permit reviews. <br />City Planner McCann stated that when a resident submits a permit, he estimates that the review <br />would take about one week. He estimated that each staff member involved in the process spends <br />at least 15 minutes. <br />Planning Commission/ August 25, 2022 <br />Page 25 of 27 <br />