Laserfiche WebLink
.Hir~:U. Iy, in coming to a decision on this r,$~uest the committee may wish to review the <br />at'~ached correspondence from the law f~rrn of Kennedy and Graven relative to the <br />que:~tJon of liability placement of stop signs which ma7 not conform to MMUTCD <br />gui<iance standards. It would appear that the response from Mr. Charles LeFevere <br />~ggests :hat there is lixle or no consistency in how the courts have viewed the immunity <br />rnt~nicipalities in such instances. <br /> <br />Recommendations: <br /> <br />S~;a~:f recommends that the existing signage at th.is intersection is appropriate and' <br />recommends no change in the signage at the intersection of Marmoset and '154t~ Lane. <br /> <br />.~ction: <br /> <br />Motion to recommend to City Council that the existing signage at this intersection is <br />appropriate and recommends no change ir; the si~nage at the intersection of Marmoset <br />and 154m Lane. <br /> <br />Re~,iewed By: <br /> <br />]7_) ean <br />B rian <br />Ora~t <br /> <br /> <br />