Laserfiche WebLink
come before Council for approval with less ~ime needed for review. At that time any unique <br />elements about the property or easements would be discussed in detail. He advised the tWo types <br />of draft easements are very similar, the difference being that one allows public access (trails), <br />ahd the other does not. <br /> <br />AssiStant Public Works DireCto~ 0.1. son indicated staff will be.bringing a case back to the Council <br />.for dir¢ctidn, after City. AttorneX review~ on-the easerdent templates. If there are not any changes.. <br />to ttie template after negotiations with the pr0pefty owners, the easements will be ratified in the <br />consent agenda. If there are sig~ficant changes: there wi'Il be a case-prel~ared that outlines the' <br />proposed changes. <br /> <br />Counciimember Str°mmen 'asked if there was an example used in drafting the easements. . <br /> <br /> Assistant Public Works Diredtor Olson rgplied a template was. use& from. LC1V~.'. Mihor ~hanges <br /> · were made to the utility section due to the restr/ctiveness of construction techniques, lie <br /> explained another reason to bring these templates ~forward is th'at .there-was si:gnificant discussion.: <br /> last year in regard§ to.'snowraobile use in any of these easements, Restrictions on this use' were' <br /> removed from the, easements, but the restriction will likely be requested often:: - <br /> <br /> The"consen'sus of ihe coUncil.` was .t~ :.direct stiff to'Proceed 'with l~girig:;a'.case' back', to,t/~e, <br /> Co..unci! f.or ap~i:0val ofthejLCMR trai.t easements after. City Attorney r~vi~ew~ '- . <br /> <br /> Further discussi0n!'. Maypr Pro Tem BlVlg inquired if the'City will be .. attempfing_, t9 obm. in the..- <br /> remaining $t}500,000: of the~i grant}: wh/ch~ was originally"in.th~ amokmt of. $2,000,000 <br /> Administrator Norman replied the grant Was cut to $500,000 due to the funds available.' <br /> <br />"2).. Use of~ity Hall Campu~ ' ,': '-' - . · .... <br /> <br /> Ci'6/')~ckninistrittbr Nomian'stated as co, nstrucfion 'of a new.Mfiniaipal Center progr~sse,~, it is.'. <br /> time t6 begih diScfi~iions bfthe 6urrent City Yfall campus sited There have been-past dlsc. u~ ~sions. <br /> wii!,~: ¢~. Artbk.a.:He.~pi, in Schdol' Digt~ict cdnc~ng the futvre~ 6f a p0ssib[e middle, sch~OI. <br /> p~:'0f those.discu~siohs;' Staff h~is been in c0rnihtmications~ wi~ the..Scl!?t~ District eonde.m, ing'i..~ <br /> ¢;C'he~ds" :bf a'"potehtiat m{ddle" School site' He' adyised:.on~ 0Pportumty¢. staff, w0u!d <br /> discuss with Council is the land to the south o£the current city Halt'camp~s, The l~nd has been_. ' <br /> purchased for residential development and staff has discussed that site'with the, School Dj§trier. <br /> ' Sfaff V~6utd like' to ask the Eofincil- ~6 Consider-a- swap with some of the land so that housing,. <br /> development could take place to the south.of Alpine Boulegard; the current City I-I~tll".cgrapus <br /> site. <br /> <br /> The Council discussed'the possibility of a land swap with GM. Homes and designating land for <br />, the Scho'ol Distric. t. <br /> <br /> The consensus of the Council was to direct staffto begin negptiations Wlth GM Homes rega'rding.. <br /> a potential land ~wap for land' south of the. current City Hall campus, as Icing as the School <br /> District is interested in holding this locati'on for a future middle school site. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />City Council Work'Session / July 19, 2005 <br /> Page 3'of6 ' <br /> <br /> <br />