My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 11/15/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2005
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 11/15/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:30:03 PM
Creation date
11/10/2005 3:48:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
11/15/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE #2 <br /> <br />2006 STREET MAINTENANCE PROGRAM <br />By: Steven J. Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />.,-x~ ttachcd to this case, under separate cover is a draft Feasibility Study for the 2006 Street <br />Mai n tcnance Program. The 2006 program consists of twelve individual projects addressing the <br />n~aintcnance needs on 24 miles of City streets. Projects 06-01 through 06-04 which covers 11 <br />~ ~ilcs o I' City streets, will receive a sealcoating preceded by sealing of cracks having widths <br />which exceed one-quarter inch. Projects 06~05 and 06-12 which involve 13 miles of street, will <br />t-cccive a one and one-half inch bituminous overlay of the existing bituminous pavement. The <br />200~> program includes nine miles of MSA street. <br /> <br />'Irc City has conducted an annual street maintenance program since 1981. It has been the City's <br />0olic¥ to assess 50% of the cost associated with these improvements. A complete listing of the <br />City's policies concerning the assessment practices are summarized.in Appendix C. The initial <br />s I:ep o/' ~.his process has been the presentation of the program to the Public Works Committee. <br /> <br />'I'he 200~'~ program is proposed to be financed through a number of funding sources including <br />MS,.'\ t'u~ds, developer escrows, special assessments, and City general funds. It should be'noted <br />that MSA streets will be special assessed in the same manner as other city streets. A summary of <br />tl~e anticipated funding is attached and a brief description of the unique funding associated with <br />i~clividLtal projects is presented below. <br /> <br />Project ()6-01 will not be an assessment project since funds for the first sealcoating of newly <br />co[~.~tructcd streets have been escrowed by the project developer for this purpose. Project 06-04 <br />i~; comprised of collector MSA streets and do not have the typical fronting densities that are <br />f'mmd in residential subdivisions. This project will assess the few fronting properties along these <br />streets the average sealcoating assessment in accordance with Assessment Policy No 6. Project <br />064)3 includes the sealcoating of streets in a commercial and industrial area. This project will be <br />~,~ssesscd based upon area in accordance with Assessment Policy No 7 which was adopted in <br />2003. The remaining projects have been aggregated by subdivision or similar lot sizes and will <br />be asscssccl per unit in accordance with Assessment Policy No. 1. <br /> <br />Since much of the 2006 program consists of bituminous overlays on streets with rural sections <br />('no curbing), the need for shouldering wiil be a significant element of the work. In previous <br />years thc City bas shouldered with topsoil and seed, however in the 2004 and 2005 programs the <br />shouldering work was done with a class 2 aggregate which has superior shouldering properties, <br />but is not as aesthetic. Staff would like to discuss this element of the work with the Committee. <br /> <br />~l'ablc 0 o f the Feasibility Study contains a listing of the schedule of project milestones associated <br />w itl~ rials program. Staff anticipates presenting the study to City Council on December 13, 2005 <br />and holding a Public Hearing on the program on January 24, 2005. The Committee might note <br />that thc schedule fbr the 2006 program is roughly four to six weeks earilier than it has been for <br />i-,rcvi(ms street maintenance programs. The reason for this is to allow for the sealcoating <br />~,pcration to occur earlier in the summer. There is less likelihood for the sealcoat chip to strip <br />Ii-om thc pavement when sealing occurs earlier in the seas'on because this allows the summer heat <br />t~) cure and set the chip. <br /> <br />Y;tal'[' is open to any direction the Committee may have on the draft Feasibility Study. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.