My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 11/10/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2022
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 11/10/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 11:39:48 AM
Creation date
11/4/2022 4:09:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
11/10/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
352
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Musgrove commented that she did not recall the discussion. She stated that the <br />Council did raise some fees where it felt appropriate. She referenced the concern related to limited <br />land for development and the need to capture funds now. She stated that the money raised through <br />Park Dedication cannot be used in existing parks and therefore asked where the additional funds <br />would be used. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood commented that the discussion of the <br />Commission last year overlapped the discussion of the Council and therefore it was an issue of <br />timing as the recommendation from the Commission came in the night before the first reading of <br />the fees by the Council. He explained that there needs to be a nexus between the fees and the need. <br />He commented that within the CIP there are millions of dollars of projects, therefore there is a <br />demonstrable need. <br />Vice Chair Sis stated that he would also recommend an increase beyond what was previously <br />recommended because of the increasing cost of materials to build out park spaces and features. <br />He stated that perhaps the recommendation from last year be doubled, which would be $4,500 for <br />residential park dedication and $1,300 for trail fees. <br />Commissioner Loss commented that he agrees with the Trail Fees but asked if the Park Dedication <br />should be even higher. He asked Councilmember Musgrove for details on the discussion the <br />Council may have. <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that City staff will make a presentation with the <br />recommendation of the Commission, a potential alternative, and/or the Council could make a <br />different choice. <br />Vice Chair Sis stated that the increases proposed as not out of line with inflation and believed that <br />that increase will most likely remain at that level. <br />Commissioner Walker stated that he would support $1,500 for a trail fee. <br />Vice Chair Sis asked if there is a delineation for Trail Fees and whether there is a separate fund <br />for trails versus parks. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood replied that the Trail Fees are deposited into <br />the Park Trust Fund and therefore there is not a distinction. He agreed that there is a lot of need <br />for trail projects as well. <br />Commissioner Leistico stated that in light of the additional information related to the Council <br />decision last year she would support the additional increase. <br />Motion by Commissioner Barten, seconded by Commissioner Loss, to recommend to City Council <br />that Park Dedication effective for 2023, be $4,500 per dwelling unit, and that Trail Fees be $1,500 <br />per dwelling unit and that the per acre rates for the commercial/industrial subdivision of land <br />remain static, at the existing 2022 rates. <br />Park and Recreation Commission/October 13, 2022 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.