Laserfiche WebLink
a. The CITY may, at its option, perform or engage one or more third parties to <br />perform the PERMITTEE'S obligations. If, in the reasonable judgment of the <br />CITY'S staff, the PERMITTEE'S default creates an immediate risk to public <br />health or safety, the CITY may perform or engage one or more third parties to <br />perform the work before the CITY provides the notice described in the initial <br />paragraph of this Section, but the CITY must use commercially reasonable efforts <br />to notify the PERMITTEE as promptly as possible that the CITY is undertaking <br />to perform the PERMITTEE'S obligation or obligations. If the CITY performs <br />one or more obligations of the PERMITTEE, the PERMITTEE must reimburse <br />the CITY for any costs or expenses the CITY reasonably incurs, including costs <br />and expenses for CITY staff time to perform the work, within thirty (30) days <br />after the CITY notifies the PERMITTEE, in writing, of the costs and expenses <br />the CITY incurred to perform the work. If the PERMITTEE does not reimburse <br />the CITY within said thirty (30) day period, the CITY may pursue any remedies <br />available to the CITY either at law or in equity or, in the alternative, the CITY <br />may draw on the financial guaranty the PERMITTEE has provided to the CITY <br />pursuant to this Agreement to reimburse itself for the expenses the CITY incurs <br />to perform the work. This Agreement is a license for the CITY to act, and it shall <br />not be necessary for the CITY to seek a Court Order for permission to enter the <br />PERMITTEE Property. As an alternative to seeking recovery from the <br />PERMITTEE or the financial guaranty, the CITY may levy special assessments <br />against the Subject Property in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 429, <br />and the PERMITTEE, for itself and its successors in title, hereby expressly <br />waives any and all substantive and procedural objections or defenses the <br />PERMITTEE may have to such special assessments; <br />b. The CITY may commence an action in Anoka County District Court to pursue <br />any remedy available to the CITY at law or in equity including, but not limited <br />to, injunctive relief; <br />c. The CITY may refuse to grant building permits for improvements to be <br />constructed on any lots within the Plat until the PERMITTEE has cured all of its <br />defaults hereunder; and <br />d. The CITY may draw upon all or any portion of the financial guaranty the <br />PERMITTEE has provided to the CITY pursuant to Section 5 and (i) use all or <br />any portion of the proceeds from the financial guaranty to reimburse the CITY <br />pursuant to subsection (a) above; or (ii) use all or any portion of the proceeds from <br />the financial guaranty to satisfy any judgment the CITY obtains against the <br />PERMITTEE pursuant to subsection (b) above. <br />12. Haul Route. Truck traffic hauling routes must be reasonably approved by the City <br />Engineer. <br />13. Limits of Construction. The City Engineer shall reasonably approve the limits of <br />construction of the Improvements. <br />14. Miscellaneous. <br />3 <br />