Agenda - Council - 11/07/2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CC Regular Session 6. 1. Meeting Date: 11/07/2022 By: Craig Swalchick, Community Development Information Title: PUBLIC HEARING: Introduce Ordinance 22-27 Amending Chapter 2 of Ramsey City Code to Modify Abatement and Appeal Procedures Purpose/Background: The purpose of this Amendment to Chapter 2, Article VII, of the Ramsey City Code, is to better streamline the appeal, abatement, and citation process with the City. This, in turn, will make it more resident -friendly and efficient, while still providing the ability to correct violations as the City Council determines. By adopting this code, we are removing third party legal consultations and allowing residents to voice their concerns directly to staff and the City Council, not only reducing the fiscal impact on the residents, but on the City as a whole. This will help reduce the cost for the community, in both staff time and fees associated with abatements. We will also streamline those who oversee the abatement process to ensure expeditious action and create an opportunity to appeal those actions in a more community -orientated fashion. Notification: Notification of the public hearing was provided in the legals section of the Anoka UnionHerald on October 19th 2022. Observations/Alternatives: City Staff have observed instances where the ability to remove public nuisances could be streamlined in a more efficient way, effectively costing less money, less staff time, and more easily understood by our community. In doing this, we will allow for a more streamlined appeal process that allows our residents to ultimately appeal these decisions to Council. Currently, the City of Ramsey places the Chief of Police as the administrator of the abatement process and the one responsible party to ensure appeals are heard in a timely manner, although the Community Development Department investigates, addresses, and ultimately abates public nuisances. Changing the Code will allow the Community Development Department to oversee the abatement and appeal process and remove the Chief of Police from this process altogether. This will allow residents to work directly with the staff that oversee the code enforcement processes to address any appeal concerns. We will also be changing the requirement to obtain a hearing officer. Currently, when used, hiring an outside attorney as a mediator costs more than the $250.00 obtained as a hearing fee. One of the concerns of using a hearing officer is that that officer is paid by the City and that it may be biased in the decisions. The new process would essentially require the property owner to request a conference with the Planning Manager and/or Community Development Director to go over the violations, if the resident feels like the violation determination was wrongful. If a case cannot be resolved during the conference, the subject can then escalate to the City Council through a public meeting to determine the validity of the case through their appeal. This enables the residents to be heard by elected officials about Code concerns, and provides an opportunity for elected officials to potentially change or correct Codes they believe to be unfair to our property owners. While using a hearing officer, if the decision is disliked by the resident, they would have the option to appeal through the City Council. By changing the Code, we eliminate the cost of a hearing officer and create an opportunity to resolve Code matters in-house.