My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/22/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 11/22/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 2:00:09 PM
Creation date
11/18/2005 2:16:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/22/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NikkiO'Connell <br />5590 152"d Lane NW <br />Ramsey, MN 55303 <br />(763)767-2429 <br />October 21, 2005 <br />City of Ramsey <br />15153 Nowthen Blvd., NW <br />Ramsey, MN 55303 <br />Re: GM Homes Development <br />To whom it may concern: <br />I am writing this email to express my concerns with GM Homes and their proposed sketch plan <br />for a new development. I would request that you pass this email onto the council <br />members/planning commission who are involved in making decisions of this nature so they can <br />review prior to the November 3nd public meeting. <br />My concerns rest with GM Home's points of discussion regarding 152"d Avenue and 15211d Lane <br />through/access streets. I do not understand why they are trying to push 152"d Lane as a through <br />street. This will cause a great deal of alarm and distress in our neighborhood which has 40+ <br />children, most under the age of 12. 1 am confused why they do "not feel the need to create <br />turmoil in the neighborhood if 152"d Avenue..:", but feel it is okay to create turmoil in our <br />neighborhood, where there are a lot more families that will be affected. <br />Our neighborhood on Germanium Street is very close, we have a nice community. There is a <br />feeling of safety and security knowing that the street does not go through to any other <br />neighborhoods. We know where our children are and are not worried about people taking 'short <br />cuts' through our neighborhood to get from Point A to Point B. <br />I do not understand why the developer is adamant about making 152°d Lane an access to the <br />new development. I realize the sewer/water extension is north of our street, but what does that <br />have to do with an access street? I've talked to engineers, and they stated that is no reason for <br />an access point. The question still remains why would our neighborhood be targeted as a <br />through street? There would be so many children at risk of serious, possibly fatal accidents . <br />involving motor vehicles and the upset of more traffic. <br />If his plan proposes a future through street on 152"d Avenue, why not just do it NOW. It would be <br />great access from CR 47/St. Francis Blvd and is the logical solution. There are only a handful of <br />dwellings that would be affected, a fraction of homes in comparison to 152"d Lane. As I recall, <br />there was already a proposed access off of Alpine or Nowthen Blvd., as well as Helium Street. I <br />wonder why a development of 51 homes would warrant so many access points, when our <br />neighborhood of 40+ homes only has one access and our community doesn't want it any other . <br />way. I just don't understand why 152°d Lane would even be considered, when 152"d Avenue <br />makes so much more sense. As well, I do agree that they need an access off of Alpine, BUT <br />NOT THROUGH AN ALREADY EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD. . <br />Please realize this is of utmost importance to me. I feel my children, ages 2 and 7, would be in <br />great danger if they open this road to a new development, not to mention the other 40 children in <br />the neighborhood. My daughter wouldn't be allowed to ride her bike anymore, my son would <br />have to be practically chained up to make sure he didn't make his way to the front yard. People <br />would, undoubtedly, speed through our neighborhood endangering the lives of our children, <br />-257- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.